Homer
07-07-2006, 09:21 PM
I've written a trilogy--together the three novels comprise a dark tale about the fall of Classical Rome and the rise of monolithic Christianity (I see it as historical fiction crossing over into literary fiction; as I see it, the innovation is a postmodernist fall of Rome novel; the trilogy deconstructs myths while infusing a touch of magical realism). Yes, I set out to write a single novel, but just after beginning the last third of my story, I realized that what I was creating was three novels, which together would ultimately comprise about 260,000 words. Yes, I know this happens a lot, and the three novels structure sometimes turns out to be a fiction (no pun intended); but trust me here, at least for purposes of answering my question, that what I really have is three novels each of similar length (82,000-88,000 words) and each comprising a distinct build up, climax and resolution. Still, the third novel contains the climax of the whole series; there is a strong interrelationship between "Book I," "Book II," and "Book III" (each is separately titled, and the series has a distinct title).
So here is my question: Can or should I send three queries, three partials, etc.? The benefits, as I see them, are that I get more space to fully develop my presentation, and I really drive home the point that these really are three novels. (Needless to say, compressing my entire story into one paragraph is awful; of course you all are aware of this kind of agony.) But obviously, if I annoy, I defeat my purpose. What do you think?
So here is my question: Can or should I send three queries, three partials, etc.? The benefits, as I see them, are that I get more space to fully develop my presentation, and I really drive home the point that these really are three novels. (Needless to say, compressing my entire story into one paragraph is awful; of course you all are aware of this kind of agony.) But obviously, if I annoy, I defeat my purpose. What do you think?