ATP
05-17-2007, 08:40 PM
[After checking the forum archives, this film now appears to have its own thread. Ta da!]
Tonight I watched STF on dvd again - now, going onto maybe 6 times. And, I never get bored with it. I wonder why?
Script-wise:
Yes-it is as one reviewer called it Charlie Kaufmann-lite;
Yes-its premise is interesting, while the script is underpinned by a good balance of both intellect and story-telling;
Yes-it feels 'good' both for the writer and the audience
Yes-it feels like it has been solidly worked on eg. someone took the time to make it 'coherent';
Yes-it treats its central characters not as caricatures but with humanity
Yes-it might be a little maudlin at places but this is appropriate and has more to do with it resonating with the larger idea which seems to be there hovering at the right distance in the background;
Yes-it had some nice touches of humour and pathos eg. protagonist's statement of affection for his love interest and his offering her flowers in the form of a variety of flours;
Yes-the threads of the sub-plot were quite well-handled;
Visually/Stylistically:
Yes-it had a certain freshness and variety.
In summary-
STF while not a 'classic' film, is one where the parts come together well - script, acting, direction, visual style.
Tonight I watched STF on dvd again - now, going onto maybe 6 times. And, I never get bored with it. I wonder why?
Script-wise:
Yes-it is as one reviewer called it Charlie Kaufmann-lite;
Yes-its premise is interesting, while the script is underpinned by a good balance of both intellect and story-telling;
Yes-it feels 'good' both for the writer and the audience
Yes-it feels like it has been solidly worked on eg. someone took the time to make it 'coherent';
Yes-it treats its central characters not as caricatures but with humanity
Yes-it might be a little maudlin at places but this is appropriate and has more to do with it resonating with the larger idea which seems to be there hovering at the right distance in the background;
Yes-it had some nice touches of humour and pathos eg. protagonist's statement of affection for his love interest and his offering her flowers in the form of a variety of flours;
Yes-the threads of the sub-plot were quite well-handled;
Visually/Stylistically:
Yes-it had a certain freshness and variety.
In summary-
STF while not a 'classic' film, is one where the parts come together well - script, acting, direction, visual style.