I just awarded myself 200 EXP for deciding which story idea I should stick to.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why I am not succumbing to the site. Really, I can't even begin to imagine what would count as worth ten, or twenty, or fifty XP. If anything, I would prefer preset values assigned to each activity, that way any gaming of the system is managed. How much is uploading another five pages to the website worth? Or writing ten thousand words? Or... dealing with the rampant idiocy I am subjected to in RL? The arbitrary nature of the "rewards" seems to turn me off.
Meanwhile, Stuart Baird is working as an editor to this day, and has had the occasional directing gig sent his way (including one of the Star Trek films) as a thank-you for his editing salvage jobs. Paul Hirsch, as you mention him, hasn't directed but I suspect he could have done if he had wanted to.
Y'know, this is probably one of those thoughts which could keep the peeps in the TV & Film section of the board arguing for weeks, but I really don't see editing as a stepping stone. An editor's career is not somehow magically validated by stepping into the role of director. There are people who oversaw (literally)
thousands of films in the forties and fifties, and I hold them in very high regard, irrespective of them moving on to other roles.
Baird is one of those people who make me think of the golden age people. He's got a steady hand, a very good eye, and is able to find things inside an image which others would miss. Ironically, some editors who step into directing have been lumbered with some entirely unimaginative and pedestrian editors for their own films. YMMV on the auteur theory, but I do believe that everyone brings something to a film (or, for that matter, television show) even if it is a small contribution.