NYC Pitch and Shop - The Ethics of Pitching
Before debating the issue, which btw to my knowledge only came into existence on April 23/24 when Making Light posted a genuine call for writers everywhere to rise up and rage against the pitch machine, I offer this quote from a thread further down in this forum.
It is from Will Lavendar, an active member of Absolute Write and a former attendee at the NYC Pitch and Shop:
"This conference helped me TREMENDOUSLY. Tremendously. I did a few things in New York that were of help: I changed the title of my manuscript after it was clear that our group didn't really care for it, and the title change helped me realize some of the book's themes; I was asked to submit my manuscript to an editor at Penguin (something I put on my query letters); and I tightened my query to the point where I was 90% succesful in terms of agents asking for partials or fulls. I also met some good people and some good writers there.
According to their website, three of the writers in the group I was in have made deals. I'm with Shaye Areheart; another writer is with Plume; another is with Knopf. There were 16 in the group. That tells you that, while these writers may not have landed deals with editors during this conference (I didn't; the manuscript was eventually rejected by Penguin), there is some legit talent in the groups you pitch with.
I have no idea who "the Pitch Bitch" is. She certainly wasn't part of my group. The teacher of my and the OP's group was a man named Charles Salzberg, and he did a great job.
I can only speak for myself: it was well worth the money I paid."
______
Thank you, Will Lavendar. We wish you success and look forward at the NYC Pitch and Shop to helping out more writers like yourself. Having said, let's move on to discuss the ethics of pitching, since some well-meaning people have somehow determined the issue actually exists.
Whatever the "uselessness" of certain types of pitching, one must admit that most pitching can be useless, but no more so than most query letters or other methods of getting the attention of an agent or publisher. Those in the business know there is a right way and a wrong way to pitch.
Therefore, no real ethics is involved with the act of pitching itself, or pitches, any more than with query letters -- rather a simple right way/wrong way. Now, if an event that maintained a pitch environment was knowingly ineffective yet pretended to be otherwise and then trick writers with advertising copy into attending and wasting their time, an ethical question exists regarding the nature of that particular event. And as much as Making Light attempts to make this argument, in one way or another, the argument can only be made by not checking the facts, or by obscuring them. Whether unethical intent exists or assumptions are made out of good will, not an issue here.
Just to clear the air, the NYC Pitch and Shop (though the website makes all this evident), holds pitch training sessions, pitch review sessions, and actual pitch sessions with editors from major houses in NYC including Ace, Random House, Viking, and others. Commenters on the blog are confused by all this and can't seem to understand who does what or what is being done or whatever. Now it is clear. Also, the pitch workshop leaders and editors discuss the market mechanics and structure of the novels involved with an aim towards improving them. Bonus.
Thanks again to Will Lavendar for his post and good luck to all the science fiction writers attending the "speed dating" pitch sessions at the upcoming SFWA event in May. I hope they are as well trained as our writers at the NYC Pitch and Shop.
Cheers