Horse Questions, part I

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
I got a pm asking an excellent question--and bringing up an issue that has made me roll my eyes more than once, when reading a story with horses. I thought I'd repost my response here, with a pared-down version of the original question:
1. a) What's a reasonable maximum daily distance that you could expect a horse and rider to travel in a day, assuming that the same horse is ridden for a week or two straight and you don't want to ride the horse into the ground? ... b) Would riding double decrease that distance significantly?... c) Would bringing a remount increase that distance?
That's actually a pretty complicated question, with a ton of variables that can make a difference. :) Terrain, size and breeding of horse, what kind of gear, stirrups or no....etc. :)

Figure for long distance stuff, in moderate terrain, a fast horse, pushing hard, will cover @ 15 miles an hour. An average horse will cover 8-10 miles an hour. The further you go, the more complicated it gets trying to hold your horse together, though. note: A short sprint is an entirely different pace!

A more leisurely pace would be completely understandable, for standard travel.--say cut the above times in half, and cover ground walking and trotting. In that case, if you do slow down, you have an easier time keeping your horse alive and sound (not limping) It would be entirely reasonable to ride 35-40 miles in a 8 to 10 hour day, with a break or two. Not for the faint of heart, though. It's gonna hurt, unless your riders are accustomed to all those hours in the saddle.

One rider, with gear, on a fit horse can cover 25-35 miles in about 4-5 hours at a fairly steady trot with some cantering and some walking, to break up the pace--figuring in at least one hour-long rest period...you can do that daily, without much trouble, indefinitely. Again, taking as given that the horse is fit, not a horse who has stood in the pasture unworked for months.

Your hypothetical rider will spend most of his time "posting" a trot--I can give you the history and a description of the technique, if you'd like. It's pretty much the most efficient gate for distance traveling. The Pony Express riders went much faster, but the horses did not have to go out on consecutive days.

Add a remount, and the rider can cover double the ground, without much trouble. If only travelling for 6-7 consecutive days, you could do that on two horses, resting when completely exhausted, and reasonably cover 80-100 miles a day, on roads and good trails. 50-60 miles a day, cross country, or steep terrain.

Add steep terrain, deer tracks to follow or no trails at all...you'll be lucky to make it 5-10 miles.

Add a 100 lb person riding double, you can probably get away with 25-30 miles a day, for 5-7 days...but you'll have a tired horse, trying to go lame, and getting cranky about being saddled. Also probably getting quite sore over the loins.

A horse bred to trot will go more efficiently and even faster, a standardbred or arab, say 25 miles in 2-1/2 to 3 hours-- 50 miles in 6-7 hours (that's riding time only, you'll have to figure in at least a brief rest for the horse every 2-3 hours, with a big drink (ideally) and something to eat, even if it's just a few mouthfuls of grass.

On a rangy, athletic, fit horse, bred to trot, it would be entirely reasonable to cover 40-50 miles a day (counting time to rest) for a week or so, in 7-8 hours, before needing to have some time off.

The horses bred for endurance can cover around 100 miles in about 12-16 hours (again, just on average) but cannot do so day after day--would need several days to rest afterwards, or you're risking metabolic failure or lameness. (carrying around 190-200 lbs)

A heavier horse (draft or draft mix, like you'd expect of a horse who carried a knight in armor, for instance, will take longer, and need more frequent rest stops. Also, a heavier horse won't stand up well to longer distances than around 40 miles.
 
Last edited:

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
Horse Question, Part II

2. When you stop for the night, what would you do in the way of horse care? Unsaddle, rub down, blanket (?), check hooves? High energy food if you've got it?

Hydration is actually a big factor--horses will go into metabolic failure fairly quickly, if they become dehydrated and over-fatigued. So you're looking for food and water all day, along the trail. You don't pass water without drinking...ever. You try to let your horse grab a couple of mouthfuls of grass, whenever you can spare the time.

When you put him up for the night, you'll check him over for sores or galls caused by the gear, you'll wipe him down with water (warm if you can get it) to take off the crusted-on sweat and dirt. If you can't get a sponge or rag to rub him down, you're going to brush and curry and brush some more, until his coat is clean and smooth.

You'll check his legs for nicks, heat, swollen places, etc., you'll check his shoes for rocks, and to make certain they haven't slipped or loosened...(if he isn't shod, cut the above distances in about half--cuz he'll wear his feet off too fast, otherwise) note: there are, of course, exceptions to this generalization--the Comanches rode unshod horses for staggering distances. There's an old saying about how far a cowboy, a Mexican, and a Comanche can ride a horse without killing it.
Wish I could remember precisely how it goes.

You'll give him a high-energy ration, soaked, if possible...probably a mix of corn and oats (up to around 10-12 lbs), and then you'll follow with all the good clean hay he wants to eat, and likewise, you'll make sure he has free access to clean water all night. if you can beg a fistful of salt to throw in his grain, all the better.

Yep, if you have a wool blanket, toss it over him--unless it's hot enough outside that he'll sweat with the blanket on. It's that much less energy he has to expend to keep himself warm.

Wow. I've gone a bit long, here. Let me know if you have any more specific questions, or anything else you're wondering about.

And if you're curious and up for a little further research, check out: http://www.aerc.org/ or also:
http://www.endurance.net/

I hope this helps, and good luck!
 
Last edited:

ritinrider

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
324
Location
SE OKlahoma, out in the country
Wow Mac, almost what I was looking for, thanks.

Here's my scenerio, It's 1864-65, something like that. A Young woman, around 28 I think, is riding across IT (Indian Territory) toward Arkansas with her daughter (about 5 or 6). They don't have much in the way of gear, just what she could tie on the two horses (she didn't want to take a pack horse, probably because she didn't have one). She isn't following a trail, but she is taking time to try to hide her trail. She is being tracked by two men who start out at least 2 maybe three hours after she does. About how far can she travel and how soon can the men catch up to her.

This is what I was thinking, she leaves headed east (the way they expect her to go) they follow her 2-3 hours later. She turns north about the time the men start out. They miss where she turns north at first and lose about 30 min. looking for her trail. About an 1 1/2 hours later she angles back to the southwest (toward the town she left) then in another hour or so she turns back toward the east.

What are the chances she can do all of this in one day, without them catching up to her? And how many times will she have to stop for more than 5 min. for her daughter, and her, to rest and stretch?

See, I told Barb I keep coming up with more questions for my book.

Can you help? Please?

Thanks,
Nita
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
how far does she have to get? If the two men are two or three hours behind her, and having to follow hidden trail, unless they are better-than-average trackers, they aren't going to catch up real fast...following trail takes a bit of time, you have to dismount, sort out footprints, etc.

Kids on horseback actually fare better than adults. If I had a five or six year old daughter (what's that 60-70 pounds?) and was an smallish-to-average-sized young woman, I'd ride double with the kid (she's old enough to ride behind me and hold on) leading one horse to trade off when the first got tired.

I'd also keep to either roads (where you can't very well sort one print from another) or rocky, hardpan sorts of surfaces. The creek trick you see in books and movies is all well and good, except sooner or later you must come out again, and riding down the middle of a creek is much slower time than on regular, firm surfaces, and hard on the horses' stamina. Where you come out will be fairly obvious, unless you have a handy gravel bank.

If the woman is a good rider, with a constantly more-or-less fresh horse, she could actually increase the distance between her and her chasers.

If she's used to riding, then she won't have to stop for longer than to water the horses, and she and her daughter can stretch their legs while the animals water and graze--say three or four 15 minute stops over the course of the day. The followers will also have to rest their horses and water, or risk having their horses drop out from under them.

With a two hour head start, and a spare horse? These guys are actually gonna play hell catching up, if she knows what she's doing at ALL.

Does she know she's being followed? Or is she hiding her backtrail because she's in IT?
 
Last edited:

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
by the way--the Rumor Mill article is okay...but not great. There are a few inaccuracies, but it's mostly good information.

But that's also horse people, for ya. :D We can quibble for days over the simplest things...
 

Andrew Jameson

(not his real name)
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
1,701
Reaction score
623
Location
Detroit
Yeah, thanks for the info, Mac (I had the original question that you answered in PM, but I missed this thread a month ago).
 

Fern

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
96
Might also remember that a 5 or 6 year old, while holding up fine riding, is still going to be getting pretty whiney after a couple hours of riding. Sound carries more in some areas than others.

Lots of pine in the area you're talking about, so could be that traveling not on a trail, sound might be somewhat muffled from pine needles.

It might be helpful to go to the OKGenWeb site that shows IT maps as they were at that time. You can get the lay of the land, as well as names of the towns that were in existance then.
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
heh--it depends on the 5 or 6 year old...there are kids that young completing 50 mile endurance rides in competition--and a handful around that age that complete 100 mile rides.

Savage, tough little brutes.

But Fern's right. I also forgot to ask what your heroine is wearing, is she riding astride, or sidesaddle, etc...
 
Last edited:

ritinrider

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
324
Location
SE OKlahoma, out in the country
Ya'll are so great. Thanks, also thanks for the website, it was mentioned to me to consider looking for answers on the web, but usually my questions are so general that doesn't help much.

Mac, I haven't figured out yet what she's wearing. She's a hardy pioneer woman having lived in IT for at least 6 years before the story takes place. It wouldn't be too weird to have her wearing pants. But on the other hand she's also a missionary, or at least her husband was a preacher, so she's probably wearing a skirt or at the very least a split skirt. And no, she is not riding side-saddle, she's riding the other way, whatever that's called.

Also, remember children in that era were mostly raised to be seen and not heard, so it wouldn't strange for her to not whine. I read a book recently where a young boy questioned his father at almost every turn- bugged the bejeesees outa me. Also, there are a couple of references in the story to how lucky the mom is that the kid is being so good.

She doesn't know for a fact she's being followed, but strongly suspects she is or soon will be. After all she is running from something.

Nita
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
If she knows her way around a horse, and is a practical and hardy sort with a two-three hour head start, then the two pursuers will play hell catching her--especially if she pushes on after dark. They'll have to stop when the light gets too bad to follow her trail. If they are very good, and push very hard, they might catch her sometime in the afternoon or early evening, the following day.

If, on the other hand, the plot requires that they DO catch her, then she just needs some bad luck to slow her way down--a lame horse would do it, unless she just cut it loose.
 

ritinrider

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
324
Location
SE OKlahoma, out in the country
Nope, they don't catch her. I was thinking of her checking her backtrail and spotting them. After all they aren't nearly as smart as she is, and make no attempt to hide themselves. Since she's a missionary type person she can't just out and out kill them in cold blood. Despite the fact they represent a huge threat to her daughter. However, the Good Book, doesn't say she can't slow them down, or maim them in some way - she just can't kill them in cold blood.

I'm thinking of having her double back, leaving the child hidden after she stops for the evening. She'll have to be careful, it is dark. But they will stop early since they think they will easily catch her the next day. She is just a woman. As someone said, sound carries easily, so she can hear them talking for aways before she actually gets close enough to see them. She of course, is being careful and not making a sound.

Oh, another question, or two for you Mac. First, sorry, you being a horse person and all, but someone mentioned today I might want to consider having the woman and child riding mules instead of horses. Also, if I stick with horses, what kind of horses am I talking about? Are they mares or geldings? I can't imagine she or the child would be able to handle a stallion.

Thanks,
Nita
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
someone mentioned today I might want to consider having the woman and child riding mules instead of horses. Also, if I stick with horses, what kind of horses am I talking about? Are they mares or geldings?
Mules are wicked tough, with endurance coming out those long ears. I see no reason not to put them on mules--also, they can keep pace easily with a horse, coming in a wide range of sizes.

Yeah, definitely mares or geldings--geldings, most probably. Usually I see writers put their heroines on "spirited little mares" in a sort of ridiculous identification between woman and horse--and it always makes me roll my eyes.

Unless there's a strong reason to put her on a mare--it's a gift from her tragically-deceased husband, or what have you--then geldings are most likely. It's the sort of thing that would only be mentioned when you're looking for a synonym for "horse."

If you'd like someone to beta-read the scene, I'm up for it! Good luck.
 

Fern

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
96
A lot of folks here (Okla - smack in the middle of IT) ride Spanish Mustangs. . .sometimes called Choctaw ponies, in the endurance races in the area. Anyway they've been here since Spainards brought them to America. They are smallish in size, but tougher than old boot leather. They hold up to the rough trails, rocky, etc. better than some of the finer boned breeds, very sturdy breed.

Here are a couple of websites that give explicit info about them in case you are interested.

http://www.bluebayoumustangs.com/mustangs.php
http://www.conquistador.com/mustang-two.html
 

Betty W01

Empress of Cyberworld
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
717
Reaction score
141
Location
right here, silly
I love being in here... you learn all kinds of stuff while wandering through AW!
 

ritinrider

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
324
Location
SE OKlahoma, out in the country
Betty, you are so right. There is a wealth of information here. I just love it.

Mac, you're on if you're sure you want to read a very beginner attempt at writing. Right now I seem to be putting way too much info in, but figure I can cut the excess later.

Fern, where exactly are you at in OK? I'm in SE (by the prison) which is one reason I moved the locale from Texas to Oklahoma. If I want to see what the area looks like it won't take a day and a half of driving to get there, study the area and come home. Yeah, I know it's changed since the 1800's, but I can still get an idea.

Which reminds me, anybody know where I can find a topigraphical map? Isn't that the kind that shows landscape, not necessarily roads? I tried the okgen web site, but it just had a general map showing the general area each tribe occupied.

Hey, I added another 700 words tonight using some of the info garnered here. Of course, that'll probably be cut to about 300, but it is progress. Thanks all.

Nita
 

Fern

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
96
I'm in extreme SE portion. One county away from Arkansas.

Let me think about the map question. I know you can get those somewhere, but I'm having brain freeze right now.

Probably the area which would have been traveled then would be right on the edge of what we call the mountains. . .people with real mountains laugh and call them hills. They're mountains to us. Of course, everything would have been cleared by manual labor then, so mostly would be wooded area and hilly. Lots of pine trees and hardwood like oak, blackjack, elm, cedar. Also a lot of brush which would make it difficult to ride a horse through if you were off the beaten path much. There are sand hills here too, but the closer you get toward the mountain area it would be rocky roads, etc. . . something the Spanish Mustangs would handle better than most horses since their feet are somewhat like mule feet if I understand correctly.

If she has to forage for food along the way, rabbits could be knocked in the head with a rock if she is adept at it. Fish in abundance in area rivers, perch, bass, catfish; just please don't let her scale a catfish like a writer did in a western I read once. Black berries, persimmons, muscadines and mulberries. . .can't say for sure when mulberries & muscadines ripen. For those who don't know, muscadines are on a vine, usually growing up and around trees. Persimmons & mulberries are on trees, of course. Could dig up sassafrass root for sassafrass tea if needed. Also snakeroot in the area if one knows what they are looking for. They used to use it as some kind of medicine if I remember what my parents told me correctly.. . just can't remember for what.

If it was past potato digging time, folks would have potatos in the cellars or barn in case she needed to filch some. . .smokehouses would have meat hanging or canned.

Honeysuckle was in abundance here. A kid might be kept busy with honeysuckle. I've sat forever pulling those little middles out for the one drop of sweet taste you get. Can't remember exactly, its been so long.

Wild flowers I remember in abundance as a kid were the small sunflowers and Indian Paintbrushes (we called them chigger flowers). Any homeplaces back then would have fruit trees. . .peach and apple and pear for sure. Oh yeah, I almost forgot bull nettle. We had oodles and gobs of bull nettle growing wild before land was cleared years ago. Figure it was native to the area and abundant. You'd have to walk through it once with bare legs to fully understand bull nettle. Ouch! And seed ticks and chiggers. They breed by the kabillions in the Oklahoma hills.

I was trying to think of towns that would have been in existance. . .I know Eagletown in McCurtain County is very old. I have a relative buried there that died in the 1800's. Alikchi comes to mind as does Doaksville. Those would be west of Eagletown. Going toward Arkansas (west, I think) from Eagletown, one might feasibly come out around Washington, Arkansas, once the Confederate Capitol.

Sorry to drone on and on here. Just thought some of this might be helpful.
 

ritinrider

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
324
Location
SE OKlahoma, out in the country
Fern, you are such a help. One thing, remember this took place when Ok was IT, before the sooner rush. Not too many white people living hereabouts, and those that were had to have a permit to live here. I think she's probably going to finish her journey about where you live. She's actually headed for AR, but I don't think she's going to make it all the way. She's leaving from a town called Oakland (yeah, Oakland Oklahoma, go figure). It's just south of Madill. According to a man from the OK Historical Society it's a town that was in existance at that time, and near the area I wanted to start her from. She's actually a pretty good shot with a gun, so she might shoot some squirrel or rabbit. Knocking a rabbit in the head with a rock might be a little iffy.

Hadn't thought about having her fish. Mostly because I'm not sure how she would've cooked it. The rabbit or squirrel she can put on a stick and roast, fish, I'm not sure about. Also, you bring up a good point, how the heck will she clean it? And then there's the hook she'd need, even assuming she had some string to use for a line. Remember, she's traveling light, she won't have much in the way of cook ware with her. I'm thinking she needs a tin or something to cook coffee in, but I'm not sure about that and probably will drop it. After all, if she has something to make coffee in, she would then need coffee, right?

This is such fun. I actually feel like I'm making progress. Think I'll go write and let my husband have the internet.

Thanks,
Nita
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
If she's travelling light, then she'd probably carry things you could eat cold--biscuits and dried meat, maybe.

Fern is dead on about the Spanish Mustangs--which would have ended up in the occasional horse sale, or enterprising young men would have caught, broke, and sold them.

Also, that's what the local Indians would have been riding. Southern OK--that would mean which tribes, in those years? Choctaw and Cherokee? I can't remember without finding a map.
 

Fern

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
96
Nita,

The land I described is where I am and east toward Arkansas. If you're starting at Madill area, the land is going to be some different. Over that way it is flatter, still trees at that time, I'm sure, but less pine for sure than is in this area. I don't believe there would be mountainous area (hills).

Coming from Madill, when you get to the very western edge of Choctaw County, (town of Boswell) is about where the land begins to change somewhat. When bad weather hits during the winter months, it may be icy and snow on the ground or whatever over toward Durant, Madill area and as you travel eastward, when you head out of Boswell going east, it begins to change. . .slowly turning into sort of a valley (cradled on the North by the hilly area up toward McAlester, etc.) and on the South by the Red River. The winter weather gets less and less severe for the next 60 to 80 miles or so. Thats not to say we never get it, we do, just over that way seems to run more like what they get in OKC than here.

Also, don't know if the plants etc. apply over that way. Surely they do, being that close, but I don't know for certain. I know they have jack rabbits and roadrunners over that way though.

The rabbit and rock thing came from all the movies I've watched and books I've read about Indian women killing rabbits by throwing rocks at them.

I am near what was the hub of Indian Territory at that time. Be glad to answer any questions I can help with.
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
Aconite--PMed you. I'm SO sorry I missed your question. My apologies.
 

PVish

Cat hair collector
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
1,641
Reaction score
263
Location
slightly off center
Website
peevishpen.blogspot.com
Horse gaits, etc.

One thing that gripes me in several books I've read is that some writers don't know that easy-gaited horses—not trotting horses—were the preferred horses in the Renaissance (sp?) and back. The trotters--or boneshakers--would be ridden by poorer folks.

Chaucer, for example, correctly has the Wife of Bath upon an ambler (an easy-gaited horse, one that moved with a smooth 4-beat lateral gait instead of a rough 2-beat diagonal gait, as the trot is). She's well-to-do; she has a proper horse. Knights rode their amblers, while leading their great horses that they'd ride into actual battle when they were fully armored.

Many of the easy gaited breeds have died out--the Hobbies and Galloways, for instance--but we still have a batch left: Tennessee Walkers, racking horses, singlefooters, Missouri Foxtrotters, Rocky Mountain horses, Paso Finos, Peruvian Pasos, etc. The early Spanish horses were easy-gaited.

Colonial Virginians rode easy-gaited horses. Most Southerners going off to the, uh, "War of Northern Aggression" rode out on easy-gaited horses (For a while, the term "saddle horse" meant easy-gaited.) The preferred lady's sidesaddle horse was a singlefooter. Even today, some lines of Morgans and Spanish mustangs are able to do an easy-gait. The "Indian shuffle" of some Appaloosas is also an easy-gait.

When roads improved and carriage travel was practical, the trotters took over.

Many years ago, when I owned a quarter horse, my little gelding would sometimes have to run flat-out to keep up with racking horses on the trail. If he trotted, they'd leave us far behind. (Note: I now own a racking horse and a TWH.)

Anyhow, it gripes me when I read an otherwise wonderful book like "Year of Wonder" and the 17th century minister's horse trots! Arrgghh.
 

MacAllister

'Twas but a dream of thee
Staff member
Boss Mare
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
22,010
Reaction score
10,707
Location
Out on a limb
Website
macallisterstone.com
...and in a similar vein, who can tell us where the term "posting" (to a trot) comes from?



:)
 

PVish

Cat hair collector
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
1,641
Reaction score
263
Location
slightly off center
Website
peevishpen.blogspot.com
Posting

MacAllister said:
...and in a similar vein, who can tell us where the term "posting" (to a trot) comes from? :)

I can, I can! (Raises hand and waves)

From "postilion"; a guy who rode one of the horses that pulled a mail (hence, "post") carriage. Since the horses who pulled carriages were trotting horses, this guy had a heck of a rough ride. Until one of them figured out if he rose to the trot (lifted his butt off the horse) in rhythm with the horse's stride, so he went up-down-up-down, etc., his nether regions wouldn't suffer nearly as much.

A discussion of it is here:
http://www.saddle-up.org.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=100093

From http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/dictionaries/difficultwords/data/d0009403.html "postilion, postillion: n. person who rides near horse of those drawing coach etc. and acts as guide to the whole team."

I'm not sure when posting originated, but they were doing it by the mid-1800's.
 
Last edited: