Villain-Protagonists are wonderful to read about, especially if they don't brood about their problems and just get on with life.
Plain old antiheroes are better, being mixes of both noble and ignoble qualities, but I'd much rather read a villain-protagonist than a standard fantasy ueberhero any day of the week.
Uncompromising villains. I must admit to being a big fan of "ruthless and committed". Even if it means going a little more stereotypical and not showing as much of the "if only he'd been breast-fed" sympathy that's become such a requirement for villains these days.
Pretty much this. I like villains who are unrepentant--to the end. Here's the thing: unless it's an ego trip, no one thinks they're evil.
Are you telling me that a sufficiently intelligent villain can't take a look at what he's done and understand that others might see his actions as evil, even though he himself remains firm in his belief that he did what he did for a good or even noble cause? If that's the case, then I'm screwed because my entire characterization of Imaginos in Starbreaker depends in him knowing that what he has done is wrong and that he will have to pay a dire price for his actions.
Also, it's worth mentioning that people are actually pretty emotional about this kind of thing. Even if part of them realizes that other people might find what they're doing "evil", they may hotly deny it, because it's insulting to them.
Badass warrior women with short dresses, long swords, and sharp tongues. I never see characters like this actually done well, though.
I'm a big fan of the overused fantasy protagonist who, orphaned at an early age by some horrible disaster managed to overcome all odds and become a hero after finding out they're the descendant of some great warrior or kind of the past. I don't feel guilty about it, though. It's a cliche because so many people like it, after all.
Are you telling me that a sufficiently intelligent villain can't take a look at what he's done and understand that others might see his actions as evil, even though he himself remains firm in his belief that he did what he did for a good or even noble cause? If that's the case, then I'm screwed because my entire characterization of Imaginos in Starbreaker depends in him knowing that what he has done is wrong and that he will have to pay a dire price for his actions.
oooh, sounds complicatedIt wreaks of high concept.
People don't wake up in the morning and say, "Damn, I love being a villain!". I really hate villains who do do that, it just feels so fake, except in very extreme situations (i.e, they are literally a personification of evil, and can admit it).