Aconite said:You may find it useful to learn what "slander" is, and how it differs from both "libel" and "things I don't like hearing."
Yeah, and it is neither slander nor libel if it's true.
Aconite said:You may find it useful to learn what "slander" is, and how it differs from both "libel" and "things I don't like hearing."
Is it really the case that a beginning novelist would not be expected to sell 5,000 copies if he were commercially published, rather than vanity published?Fulcher paid Tate $3,900 to publish and market the book. He receives royalties on sales, and if the book sells 5,000 copies in a year — an unlikely prospect for a beginning novelist — Tate will reimburse him the $3,900.
CaoPaux said:And, since a commercial pub does a LOT more than that, odds are better that a debut novel will sell more than 5,000, especially if/when the first folks to buy it recommend it to others.
Thanks for the clarification. That's essentially what I had gathered from other threads here at AW. It's too bad the Times didn't make a distinction between vanity and commercial publication.James D. Macdonald said:5,000 is an entirely reasonable number for any first-timer to think about. Nothing outlandish there at all.
Selena, skip the ones that advertise that they're "looking for first-time authors." Reputable publishers don't care if you're a first-timer as long as your book is good. Scammers, on the other hand, talk a lot about "giving new authors a chance" and the like. As long as your book is good, you have as good a chance as anyone else, first-timer or not.Selena_Fai said:I'm almost too afraid to submit to anyone because it seems anytime I see someone likely to take on a 1st timer, they are a vanity press, or worse, Publish America. (Glad I at least was able to dodge that bullet.)