there are lots of books from legit publishers and sucessful well known writers which use stock images.
True, but I'll bet that few if any of them
1. use stock images with no alterations at all except for the title and author's name PhotoShopped on to the picture
2. use identical stock images for covers being released by the same publisher on the same day (that was how I found the brownish-yellow covers in my last post - they were on the same Amazon page when I did a PublishAmerica search)
3. use the same stock photos again and again and again, resulting in four or more books that look identical except for the title and author's name.
There is nothing wrong with using stock images
per se, but there is something wrong with using them in a repetitive, apathetic way which may give no indication of the book's content.
Also, one claim made by PA's defenders is that PA has the best cover art or the best cover designers in the industry. This was the most effective way I could think of to counter such assertions.
I think I'll just copy and paste this the next time the issue of legit publishers using stock images comes up.