• Basic Writing questions is not a crit forum. All crits belong in Share Your Work

Most Frequent Critique Responses

Status
Not open for further replies.

CrastersBabies

Burninator!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
5,641
Reaction score
666
Location
USA
I had no clue under the sun where this would fit on the board, so I'm putting it here.

I'm looking to make a list of the most frequent critique responses that we, as writers, receive on our work. Whether it's in SYW here, something from beta readers or writing group, or something you might hear from agents, editors or instructors/mentors.

For example, I hear from my writing group that I need more internalization from certain characters.

Something that a friend hears a lot is that her dialogue sounds stilted.

What do you hear frequently in your critiques? I'm not doing this to make people feel bad, but to get a general idea of what we (as a group) hear the most.
 

buz

edits all posts at least four times
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
5,147
Reaction score
2,040
Most common one I get is some variation of "what?" or "I don't know what this means" or "this is confusing" or "there's too much going on here" or "there's a lack of clarity in your worldbuilding," etc.

Lack of focus is a big one, too.

Dead-horse beating and lack of description are also significant issues...

Unnecessary words.

Shitty endings.

The voice...a variety of opinions about the voice...I don't even know anymore.

Subplot or peripheral character doesn't seem to have a purpose...

...yeah. *reflects on how much she sucks and goes to brood in a corner*

ETA: If it's helpful, the ones I *give* most often...

Unnecessary words.

Character is not flawed enough, or else they inhabit a world that is not flawed enough--some degree of perfection is poisoning the manuscript.

Character is one-dimensional.

I lost faith in the author after one too many inaccuracies, stereotypes, or predictable events.

I lost faith in the tension of the story because potentially dangerous events always deflate with no significant bad consequences (three times is usually my limit).

Subplot or peripheral character doesn't seem to have a purpose; Chekhov's gun did not go off; something carefully introduced doesn't seem to have meaning later.

Overuse of a certain word.

Massive infodumping/too much backstory/story actually starts on page 50 or something.

Too predictable.

Dead-horse beating.

Oh yeah..."telling not showing," although I'm so sick of that phrase I hate writing it now...:D
 
Last edited:

Karen Junker

Live a little. Write a lot.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
551
Location
Bellevue, WA
Website
www.CascadeWriters.com
When I was an editor for a small romance publisher, we had a list of stock rejection reasons that we could include in our rejection letters. Some of the items were:

Too many POV switches
Shifting tense
Not fitting the romance 'formula'
Too many anachronisms
Too much telling rather than showing
Goal, motivation and conflict unclear
Pacing choppy or too slow
Not starting in the right place
Overuse of a word or phrase
Mechanics (typos, grammar, punctuation or spelling)
Setting is unclear

These are just a few examples. When I crit, I usually mention any that apply to the work, which means the manuscript will have a lot of comments or corrections on it. The upshot is that most people I have offered to crit for have not taken me up on doing their whole manuscript (after seeing the detail I go into on their first chapter). The ones who stick with me usually end up getting published or at least get an agent!

I'm trying to crit differently now--I simply do not mention stuff I think could use work. People don't always want nitpicky help or criticism, they want to receive validation for their good work.
 

CrastersBabies

Burninator!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
5,641
Reaction score
666
Location
USA
Most common one I get is some variation of "what?" or "I don't know what this means" or "this is confusing" or "there's too much going on here" or "there's a lack of clarity in your worldbuilding," etc.

Lack of focus is a big one, too.

Dead-horse beating and lack of description are also significant issues...

Unnecessary words.

Shitty endings.

The voice...a variety of opinions about the voice...I don't even know anymore.

...yeah. *reflects on how much she sucks and goes to brood in a corner*

I don't think it points to "suckitude" at all! It points to self-awareness in a sense. Seems like you know your rejections well and that's probably the first step in fixing stuff!

When I was an editor for a small romance publisher, we had a list of stock rejection reasons that we could include in our rejection letters. Some of the items were:

Too many POV switches
Shifting tense
Not fitting the romance 'formula'
Too many anachronisms
Too much telling rather than showing
Goal, motivation and conflict unclear
Pacing choppy or too slow
Not starting in the right place
Overuse of a word or phrase
Mechanics (typos, grammar, punctuation or spelling)
Setting is unclear

These are just a few examples. When I crit, I usually mention any that apply to the work, which means the manuscript will have a lot of comments or corrections on it. The upshot is that most people I have offered to crit for have not taken me up on doing their whole manuscript (after seeing the detail I go into on their first chapter). The ones who stick with me usually end up getting published or at least get an agent!

I'm trying to crit differently now--I simply do not mention stuff I think could use work. People don't always want nitpicky help or criticism, they want to receive validation for their good work.

Wow, this is extremely helpful. I've heard those as well at some point in my writing "career."
 

AshleyEpidemic

Did you see my bag?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
1,561
Reaction score
119
Location
Austin
Website
www.soipondered.wordpress.com
I tend to get: This came off a bit flat to me; Let me know what the character is thinking; This feels a bit rushed; I don't get why this character is doing this; This feels a bit slow; I don't like your MC.

I don't know why everyone hates my MCs and loves my other leads, but secondary characters.
 

buz

edits all posts at least four times
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
5,147
Reaction score
2,040
I don't think it points to "suckitude" at all! It points to self-awareness in a sense. Seems like you know your rejections well and that's probably the first step in fixing stuff!

Lawlz I am very good at first steps. It's all the other ones that turn into a problem for me :D :D

Thanks, Crasters.
 

Literateparakeet

Nerdy Budgie
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
226
Location
Seattle
Website
lesliesillusions.blogspot.com
Descriptions.

It is funny and mildly embarrassing to admit, but in my crit group I used to tell a friend that she had too much description, and she in turn said I needed more. I scratched my head at that because I really didn't know what she meant or where I would put it.

Then I put my fiction writing on hold for a little while, and have been working on non-fiction. One day while reading a novel, it hit me...the subtle descriptions that add so much to a scene--that is what I was missing. I finally understood what my friend was trying to tell me.

I'm a slow learner, LOL!

The most frequent advice I see/give in SYW is show don't tell.
 

aimeestates

MADNESS
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
315
Reaction score
29
Location
NC
Website
yarghing.com
Overdone reactions from characters is my number one (talking about my writing here). Use exclamations points sparingly, and avoid using "HOLY CRAP THE SKY IS FALLING" responses whenever possible. :p
 
Last edited:

Riley

They won't let me be good
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
526
Reaction score
113
It wasn't on this board, but I had a critique partner who repeatedly scorched me for lack of clarity. Oh, and for describing an alien's face as "like the back of a surinam toad".
 

ZerosJourney

Cryptozoologist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
112
Reaction score
7
Location
Hyrule
Website
zerojourney.blogspot.com
What I've received a lot of:
--Not enough description (particularly of characters)
--Need more internalization/reaction of POV character
--MC isn't bad, but secondary character is more interesting (This one in particular too a while to sink in. I know know they were trying to tell me that I was so concerned with making my MC "relatable" and "likeable" that I gave all the interesting quirks and flaws to characters that readers weren't "supposed" to identify with.)
--Either under-explaining or over-explaining (depending on the story and narrator.)

Critiques I've given a lot:
--Head-hopping/POV drift
--Scientific inaccuracies/general implausibility
--Story starts too early
--Climax doesn't build enough, or is too easy, or victory belongs to someone other than the MC
--Pacing issues (normally this has to do with relationships resolving too early, info dumps, or backstory overload early in the novel.)
 

HapiSofi

Hagiographically Advantaged
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
676
Remarks that won't appear in the rejection letter:

Reading this felt like work, not pleasure.

Oh god, it's another one of those scenes.

Your characters are stupid. They are doing stupid things.

Your characters have stupid names.

Aaaargh, cerulean orbs, die die die.

Yeah, I watched Buffy too.

You can't do that at night in a pre-industrial culture.

You want kowtowing, not cow towing. Big difference.

Don't explain. It isn't helping.

F*ck backstory, get on with the story.

History, politics, medicine, horses, guns.

Your favorite scenes don't connect with the rest of the work.

I am bored. Bored bored bored. You suck.

This falls apart at the end.

This ends on a false note.

Way too many sentences need fixing.

And:

You have become morbidly over-conscious of he said/she said. Unless they're grossly overused, dialogue tags are invisible to the readers. Lose the saidbookisms.

You have become morbidly over-conscious of your repeated use of characters' names. Stop substituting descriptive epithets. You're allowed to use proper names more than once per paragraph when you're describing complex interactions.

(Written by an editor friend of mine; used with permission.)
 

Kathl33n

Questioning Everything
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
360
Reaction score
29
Location
Maryland - USA
"Head hopping."
"POV is not clear."
"Who's POV are we in?"
"What do you mean by this?"

And because I'm soooooo wordy, "Consider deleting."
 

J.S.F.

Red fish, blue fish...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
5,365
Reaction score
793
Location
Osaka
Most of the time I've gotten "This simply does not fit what we're looking for"...even though I've written it in the genre THEY WANTED!

"This does not match our needs."

My favorite one was--this happened only once--"This is not something we're interested in publishing and we are not recommending that anyone else does it, either."

Yeah, I take rejection well...
 

HapiSofi

Hagiographically Advantaged
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
676
I had to clean my monitor. Twice. :D

Cow towing is from a list on Making Light.

Additional items there include hare’s breath escape, plaintiff melody, empirical storm troopers, passed history not with standing, malice of forethought, fox paws, for all intensive purposes, Viola!, on the lamb, Post-Dramatic Stress Disorder, misquote spray (insect repellent), peachy king, wreckless driving, he gave her organism after organism, the human gnome project, cup of chino, the Straights of Hormuz, hammy downs, back round, poke-a-dotted, prime Madonna, otter confusion, take stalk of, a fine tooth-comb, mid-evil history, music played on queue, rot iron, thirty yacht six, she was fiberglasted, doesn’t pass mustard, the Klux Klutz Klan, stars in the fundament, pornographic memory, gentile organs, wring the changes, bearfooted Carmelites, a shoe-in, the Dodge of Venice, do un to others as you would have them do un to you, outer body experience, snuff said, left a gapping whole, piss pour timing, weekend by the loss of blood, root tail quartz, retaliated quartz, chorused their ascent, fracture of a second, evasive surgery, none disclosure agreement, he must be diluted, I don’t want to sound like a no-it-all, that’s mox nix, the project whithered on the vine, it's just here-say, caste dispersions, all tolled, barely registers a blimp on the radar, wreaking haddock, a fairly tail wedding, Kwanzaa huts, bonnified Scotsman, arguing in sotto voices, wanted him for breading stock, a date with a gorgeous read-head, synopses in the brain, enclosed is a synapse plus three chapters, and nothing in this world is real; it’s just an illustration.
 

Putputt

permanently suctioned to Buz's leg
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
5,448
Reaction score
2,980
From betas:

"Yeah, we know this. You already told us like four times."
"If I see another sentence beginning with 'Despite herself, ...' I am going to hunt myself a hippo."
"You're telling right before showing. Trust the reader."

From agents:

"Dear author, thank you for your submission, but..."
 

DancingMaenid

New kid...seven years ago!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
5,058
Reaction score
460
Location
United States
Interesting topic!

I think the most common mechanical criticism I get is regarding unclear, ambiguous, or overly-wordy passages.

I also get a lot of suggestions about expanding scenes or adding more tension to them. I have a tendency to pull my punches too much, but with some of my betas pointing that out, I think I'm getting better.
 

HapiSofi

Hagiographically Advantaged
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
676
Most of the time I've gotten "This simply does not fit what we're looking for"...even though I've written it in the genre THEY WANTED!
Maybe they're also looking for other characteristics?
My favorite one was--this happened only once--"This is not something we're interested in publishing and we are not recommending that anyone else does it, either."

Yeah, I take rejection well...
Is it okay if I don't believe that last example? It's needlessly provocative and unprofessional -- not a mistake one makes more than once -- and it has a big ol' grammatical error in it. You may have gotten it from people who called themselves a publishing company, but ... no.
 

Sci-Fi Stacey

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
77
Reaction score
6
Location
La La Land
Your MC needs more depth, your ending doesn't really suit the MS, not what we are looking for, character development....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.