PublishAmerica author sues Stephen King for plagiarism

Unimportant

No COVID yet. Still masking.
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
22,755
Location
Aotearoa
I think the rights to Keller's Den have reverted back to the author, which is why the author and not PA is pursuing the copyright infringement suit.
 

victoriastrauss

Writer Beware Goddess
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
6,704
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Far from the madding crowd
Website
www.victoriastrauss.com
Keller's Den does have an amazon ranking, but it's currently not available.
It's got a 2002 pub date, so I think Unimportant is right and the contract has terminated. (Although in what universe would PA pursue a copyright infringement suit, even for a book to which it still had the rights?)

I hadn't seen the cover before. My favorite bit is the little arm with the paintbrush.

- Victoria
 

tlblack

nothing simple here
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
824
Reaction score
129
Location
In Buzzardville!
It's got a 2002 pub date, so I think Unimportant is right and the contract has terminated. (Although in what universe would PA pursue a copyright infringement suit, even for a book to which it still had the rights?)

I hadn't seen the cover before. My favorite bit is the little arm with the paintbrush.

- Victoria

The 2002 pub date wouldn't mean it wasn't still under contract. Mine was printed in 2002 and unless I had requested rights returned, would still be under contract. If this writer has the same contract as mine, then the contract was good for the life of the copyright. (way too long) I'm not saying you're wrong, just that it isn't impossible that the book is still under contract.
 

DreamWeaver

Shakespearean Fool
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,916
Reaction score
403
On Amazon, it has four reviews which, from the wording, appear to probably all be from the same person. I expect King's and S&S's attorneys could make something of that, in terms of illustrating lack of sales.
 

Unimportant

No COVID yet. Still masking.
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
22,755
Location
Aotearoa
On Amazon, it has four reviews which, from the wording, appear to probably all be from the same person. I expect King's and S&S's attorneys could make something of that, in terms of illustrating lack of sales.

Three of the reviews are from the same person -- Jessica Henry of Greenville SC. Keller's Den is the only book she has reviewed on Amazon.
 

DreamWeaver

Shakespearean Fool
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,916
Reaction score
403
The fourth review sounds amazingly similar to the other three, FWIW.
 

circlexranch

Terri Coop has been known to write
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
749
Reaction score
149
Location
Fort Scott, Kansas
Website
readinrittinrhetoric.blogspot.com
A joint motion for extension of time for S&S to file its Reply brief has been filed. They are asking for a delay until May 12th.

The motion indicates the parties are "engaged in discussions" about the case.

Something along the lines of:

PL: I'm getting paid by the hour. I'll gladly drag this out for 5-7 years.

DF: Dismiss your case now and we won't countersue you for $50K in legal fees.

PL: Oh yeah?

DF: Oh yes, most assuredly, "yeah."

We'll know in about a month!
 

victoriastrauss

Writer Beware Goddess
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
6,704
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Far from the madding crowd
Website
www.victoriastrauss.com
I'm feeling sad, thinking about the cash the author is shelling out for this. Honestly, the whole thing has become really distasteful, with the author dancing after his delusion like the girl in the red shoes, and the lawyers pocketing money for this lost and pointless cause in order to be able to say they sued Stephen King.

Just gross.

- Victoria
 

Little1

Hakuna Matata
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 28, 2010
Messages
1,298
Reaction score
639
Location
york, PA
Me to Victoria :( The author has to know he won't win. I wonder if it has helped his sales though.. if only a little.
 

TheTinCat

I am a mighty viking!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
386
Reaction score
62
Location
Behind you
The author has to know he won't win.

Sadly, I doubt it. A lot of not-too-seasoned writers believe that their stories and ideas are utterly unique and that anyone who even comes close to writing something similar must have stolen from them.
 

DreamWeaver

Shakespearean Fool
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,916
Reaction score
403
Sadly, I doubt it. A lot of not-too-seasoned writers believe that their stories and ideas are utterly unique and that anyone who even comes close to writing something similar must have stolen from them.
What TheTinCat said. Of hopeful authors that have come up to me in the bookstore to ask about publishing, the number one fear is that someone will steal their Unique Idea [TM].

To illustrate how it's not the idea, but the writing that is unique, I would show them a short story anthology we generally had in stock. All the authors were given the same Unique Idea [TM], but all the stories came out different. Wildly different.

I'm pretty sure I only convinced a few.
 

victoriastrauss

Writer Beware Goddess
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
6,704
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Far from the madding crowd
Website
www.victoriastrauss.com
Sadly, I doubt it. A lot of not-too-seasoned writers believe that their stories and ideas are utterly unique and that anyone who even comes close to writing something similar must have stolen from them.

This.

I hear from such authors quite frequently. One author was convinced that the producers of a popular film had stolen the premise of her book, despite the fact that the book came out only a couple of months before the movie did.

- Victoria
 

allenparker

Naked Futon Guy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
234
Age
63
Location
Virginia
Website
www.allenparker.net
PublishAmerica attracts the desperate, the deluded, and the naive.

They do not necessarily stop afterward.

I somewhat disagree. They attract the uninformed. There may be some that are delusional, but I suspect that there are many delusional people sending manuscripts to other publishers as well. They just don't publish them. Or for that matter, let them on a public forum.

And I think all of us are desperate to see our work in print.

If you were to talk to people who submit a book to a publisher, 50% would have no clue of how the system worked, other than they have a shoe box full of rejections.

My personal favorite rejection of all times was the rejection written on the outside rear of the envelop, the tape holding the flap closed, and the missing sase from the inside. Oh, and the "return to sender" on the front.

There is a learning curve to this business. PA is a gentle slope that gradually carries you over the cliff.
 

Unimportant

No COVID yet. Still masking.
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
22,755
Location
Aotearoa
I somewhat disagree. They attract the uninformed.
I'd probably equate "uninformed" with "naive", so in that sense you and James Macd are both saying the same thing.

And I think all of us are desperate to see our work in print.
Is the "all of us" PA authors, or AW authors, or all authors everywhere?
 

allenparker

Naked Futon Guy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
234
Age
63
Location
Virginia
Website
www.allenparker.net
Naive is a form of uninformed, maybe, but carries a totally different expression. Willful to the point of negligent is totally different than not knowing about a subject. I guess there is an argument to be made that PA authors are negligent, but I see it different in that there are as many PA authors as there are other authors that began with no or little knowledge of the publishing world. The difference is that PA exploits them. IF Random House chose to exploit them, many others would also be in PA authors' position.

As for the other, all writers yearn to see their work in print. Yearn. Desperate. Another point of disagreement, I suppose. But I could argue that PA authors yearn instead of being desperate.

We can disagree on these points.
 

James D. Macdonald

Your Genial Uncle
Absolute Sage
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
25,582
Reaction score
3,785
Location
New Hampshire
Website
madhousemanor.wordpress.com
By "desperate" I mean someone who's been rejected by every publisher in the world, starting with Random House and working down, until they finally come to PublishAmerica.

And naive: Someone who's trusting, who doesn't consider that someone would lie to them in order to take their money (because they wouldn't even think of such a thing), someone who's led a sheltered life. Inexperienced. No shame in that, but it makes them easy marks for the con men of this world.