Some questions for substantive editors

Question

Soon I will be invincible
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 11, 2010
Messages
350
Reaction score
23
When editing a book, do you do it with "don't bore the reader" in mind or "a good box should (x)" in mind?

They may seem like the same thing, but the first means leaving things as they are as long as they're interesting while the second means suggesting things based on how things "should" be.

For example, a book has an opening that involves more events than it needs to. It's interesting, and something that would keep a reader reading, but the story doesn't start in earnest until the next chapter. Would you leave it as it is, or would you suggest the author cut it? Why?
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
When editing a book, do you do it with "don't bore the reader" in mind or "a good box should (x)" in mind?

They may seem like the same thing, but the first means leaving things as they are as long as they're interesting while the second means suggesting things based on how things "should" be.

For example, a book has an opening that involves more events than it needs to. It's interesting, and something that would keep a reader reading, but the story doesn't start in earnest until the next chapter. Would you leave it as it is, or would you suggest the author cut it? Why?

These are really questions without answers, and, I'd say, a false proposition. It's never one or the other.

Every editor I know goes with "don't bore the reader" at all times. This does not mean leaving things as they are just because they're interesting. If it can be improved, then improve it.

The sole aim of an editor is to help make the book better, more interesting, more entertaining, better written, etc.

But if the story doesn't start until chapter two, then chapter two should almost certainly start the book. Readers are interested in story and character. You generally don't have interesting until you have story and character.

Any needed information in chapter one can then be worked into the book as needed.

If there are more events than needed, then you cut the unneeded events. Why? because they aren't needed, of course. If you don't need an event, then you'll simply bore readers by including it.
 

Debbie V

Mentoring Myself and Others
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,138
Reaction score
290
Location
New York
Adding to what's above: If something is in the book, readers assume it's there for a reason. When they figure out it had no reason, they may be annoyed. Lots of stuff that isn't boring can be annoying. Don't annoy the reader is a really good rule. It keeps your book from being thrown across the room.
 

Mutive

Blissfully Clueless
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
5,262
Reaction score
3,208
Location
Seattle, WA
I'm not a substantive editor, so take what I say with a grain of salt but...

I think a lot of the reasons for the checklists is because in the vast majority of cases, the rules of thumb work.

A good editor should be able to say, "This is where this rule of thumb would apply" (versus "this is a good exception to a rule I'd usually apply".)

So I'm sure a lot use checklists - because I think it is helpful to ask things like, "How does this contribute to the novel as a whole? Where does it lie in the overall progression of the novel? How does it work with the given theme?" Because all of these are questions one *should* ask.
 

Question

Soon I will be invincible
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 11, 2010
Messages
350
Reaction score
23
Thanks a bunch :D
 

Midian

My sarcasm got the better of me.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
392
Reaction score
57
Location
Los Angeles
Website
inkslingereditorialservices.com
When editing a book, do you do it with "don't bore the reader" in mind or "a good box should (x)" in mind?

They may seem like the same thing, but the first means leaving things as they are as long as they're interesting while the second means suggesting things based on how things "should" be.

For example, a book has an opening that involves more events than it needs to. It's interesting, and something that would keep a reader reading, but the story doesn't start in earnest until the next chapter. Would you leave it as it is, or would you suggest the author cut it? Why?

The majority of my clients are substantive. What you're asking isn't really answerable. Books are good for different reasons. What works for one won't necessarily be good for another. We're looking at what THAT book should do, not what all books should do. There is no secret formula; there is no "how things should be."

A good book should be...good. You don't go into any substantive project looking for anything other than good writing and a good story. If we don't find it, we look for what's holding it back, and how it can be fixed while playing to the writer's strengths.

Strong writing doesn't equate to strong story, and vice versa.

If the scene doesn't serve a purpose, then you have to be able to cut it. Each scene should be justifiable. An interesting chapter that serves no purpose is taking the word real estate from something else that could be equally interesting AND purposeful, but didn't get written. Every word is too important to spend word count on fluff. If you can write one interesting thing, you can write 200. Interesting writing is easy (lol, okay, maybe not for everyone, but if you can write ONE interesting thing, you can write another). You have to be able to put it all together as a cohesive story. If you don't, eventually the reader will notice its not going anywhere. Book, meet shelf.
 

Old Hack

Such a nasty woman
Super Moderator
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
22,454
Reaction score
4,956
Location
In chaos
Midian, I took the OP's use of "substantive" to imply that we were being asked advice on editing rather than copy editing. Not to suggest that this was a big project he was talking about. I might be wrong.

And what you said is entirely right, of course.
 

Midian

My sarcasm got the better of me.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
392
Reaction score
57
Location
Los Angeles
Website
inkslingereditorialservices.com
Midian, I took the OP's use of "substantive" to imply that we were being asked advice on editing rather than copy editing. Not to suggest that this was a big project he was talking about. I might be wrong.

And what you said is entirely right, of course.

Aaah, upon rereading, I think you are probably right. My bad. It does sound like it was just editing in general.