50 Shades of Grey?

mfarraday

Time Traveler
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
868
Reaction score
52
Location
Connecticut
Has anyone here read 50 Shades of Grey?

Did you like it? I am curious about what all the fuss is about.

Just heard it was accepted by a U.S. publisher for...publication.

Anyway, just wondering if people liked it or not.

Thanks, might read it sometime.

- Madeleine
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,933
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
There's a big thread about it in here somewhere. Not my sort of thing but I don't really see what the fuss is about. Good luck to her.
 

mfarraday

Time Traveler
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
868
Reaction score
52
Location
Connecticut
Darn, it figures...I did search for a previous thread....wrong forum maybe? Anyway, thanks!
 

Silver-Midnight

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 19, 2011
Messages
4,910
Reaction score
279
Location
rising from the depths of a cup of coffee
Yeah, I think it's in AW Roundtable.

I haven't read it; I have heard of the fan fiction version of it though. I didn't read it, but it was popular from what I hear.

It looks like all three of her books are taking the top three spots in Amazon Paid. I think the first one took the first slot, followed by the sequel, and then the last one.
 

Filigree

Mildly Disturbing
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
1,529
Location
between rising apes and falling angels
Website
www.cranehanabooks.com
I'd heard about it, and decided to pass. I'm fond of well-written fanfic in general, but this seems to have migrated to print with its flaws intact. Also, its genesis came through Meyers' 'Twilight', and it has vampires. Neither point recommends it any more to me now than when it was a fanfic. I wish her luck, and hope she has the sense to invest her earnings well.
 

Sarah Madara

Freeway stomper extraordinaire
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
154
Location
Procrastination Nation
I have no idea what it was like originally, but the current version has no vampires or reference to anything Twilight-y. I wouldn't know if it weren't for the news that it started as fanfic.

I started reading it because of the Dr. Drew controversy and while at first I thought he was being way too judgmental, I have to say I kind of get his point. I'm not judging whether this is a "healthy" fantasy - what does that even mean?? - but it's *not* your typical strong-dominant-male romance scenario. The chick is a virgin, and her first introduction to sex is through a BDSM relationship with a guy who only likes BDSM because of his extraordinarily messed up childhood and who can't stand to be touched.

I don't know anything about BDSM so I can't speak to any authenticity issues there, but in terms of men "in control," I love a dominant hero as much as the next suburban housewife, but this one rings false for me. I think it's because the heroine is so inexperienced and unsure of herself. There are places where it smacks of abuse to me, where she really isn't happy with the arrangement. Her emotional needs aren't being met, and she's only doing the physical stuff because it pleases him, not because it pleases her. (She still has lots of orgasms, though. One of those pleasure-in-spite-of-herself scenarios.)

I think that's supposed to turn into an emotional healing thing but I haven't gotten there yet. I may not, because the writing is... meh.

Everything I've read is legal and technically consensual and I'm not trying to pass judgment. This was just what I think people might want to know about the book before they read it, if they aren't sure whether it's up their alley.

Hope that helps.

P.S. Apologies if this is the wrong thread. It looked like the other one was discussing more fanfiction/copyright issues but I didn't read the whole thing.
 

Katie Elle

Banned
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
398
Reaction score
31
Location
New England Coast
I read it last week, all three volumes. It's really one work split in three, the individual books have no coherence in and of themselves.

It's horribly written, awkward to the point of pain in some cases, but for me it was at the same time very compelling--embarrassingly so. I don't even know why, but she's definitely pushing some kind of buttons.

In terms of fanfic, I have read a lot of articles and I liked the comment "etching the serial numbers on" rather than "filing them off." It, as far as i can tell, has nothing to do with Twilight other than the original having the same names. So I think she may have exploited Twilight fandom, but I don't think she exploited Twilight in particular.

To me, the important thing about it is this is not a romance novel no matter how much Random house wants to rebrand it. There's about 5000 words in the trilogy that aren't sex scenes. And the concept that something that explicit, even if that flawed, is at the top of the NY Times ebook list is a big win for people writing erotica.
 

jennontheisland

the world is at my command
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
7,270
Reaction score
2,125
Location
down by the bay
But is it really a win? From what I've heard, here and elsewhere, and from the excerpts I've seen, it's pretty crappy writing in general. So while it may be a win that something deemed "erotica" is being noted by lists, it's still crappy porn. Which means that people will still equate erotica with crappy porn.
 

Filigree

Mildly Disturbing
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
1,529
Location
between rising apes and falling angels
Website
www.cranehanabooks.com
It's not a win. It makes us look bad in the eyes of the buying public and critical reviewers. When we could otherwise point out the real merits of our own work, we're left explaining this pile of putrescence.

I got a chapter in to FSoG, and gave up: it really is horrible writing, and the characters set back the erotic romance genre at least 30 years.
 

Sarah Madara

Freeway stomper extraordinaire
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
154
Location
Procrastination Nation
I'd say it's a win because soccer moms recommended these books to each other. Most of the steamier material on my Kindle is not something I would openly recommend to a friend, because I know so many women who will put down a book if it has too much sex in it. If more people are viewing an erotic novel as having mainstream appeal and aren't ashamed to say they're enjoying it, then I imagine that's a win for the genre overall.
 

jennontheisland

the world is at my command
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
7,270
Reaction score
2,125
Location
down by the bay
So, it doesn't matter how bad it is, as long as people are reading it? If I'd never read "erotica" before and someone recommended that book to me, I'd never read erotica again.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,933
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
If a lot of people like it, a lot of people consider it good. Right now they are discussing it on morning TV. That makes it a "win". What part of being enjoyed by a huge readership and getting a deal with Random House is non-winning? As usual, those that don't like it, don't need to read it. And forming an impression of erotica by one book is probably not going to go well regardless of the book. However the pundit on TV speaking now seems to have not read erotica before, and she liked it.
 

jennontheisland

the world is at my command
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
7,270
Reaction score
2,125
Location
down by the bay
A win for the author, yes. For the genre? I'm not convinced.

And morning TV pundits work from scripts.
 

sxoidmal

Nascent
Registered
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
I don't think every published book has to be a classic for the ages. What self-publishing shows us is that readers really want to read, and that's why embarrassingly sub-par writing samples can still generate income on e-reader sites. Readers are infinitely more forgiving than publishing houses, which makes sense since the latter has a greater financial investment in any writer it contracts with. Not so the e-reader shopping for self-published titles, who can afford to toss between 99 cents and three dollars at a gamble.

Yes, the Twilight series was very poorly written. Fifty Shades of Grey is being politely characterized as "purple prose." Does that mean they should not have seen print? What fascistic taste-maker would bar a writer from writing? At the end of the day, it is most important that reading has been done, whether it's a soccer mom exploring a new release or a new, curious reader discovering an interest. We may prefer they pick up the classics rather than People Magazine (or throw money at our brilliant and flawless work), but reading is reading, ultimately, and at the very least they're reading something.
 

ScarlettMetal

Registered
Joined
Mar 29, 2012
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I read all 3 of these books. For some simple, mindless reading, I thought they were good. If I looked at them with my writer's eye, I thought they were terrible.
 

Big Kahuna

Recovering from sock monkey trauma
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
37
Reaction score
3
Location
At my desk
I read all 3 of these books. For some simple, mindless reading, I thought they were good. If I looked at them with my writer's eye, I thought they were terrible.

Cool. Maybe I've got a shot after all.
 

Katie Elle

Banned
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
398
Reaction score
31
Location
New England Coast
Cool. Maybe I've got a shot after all.

One of the things that got me to actually try my hand was the assurance that no matter how bad your writing is, there's someone out there making money who's worse. :)
 

Big Kahuna

Recovering from sock monkey trauma
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
37
Reaction score
3
Location
At my desk
One of the things that got me to actually try my hand was the assurance that no matter how bad your writing is, there's someone out there making money who's worse. :)

Yeah, I'd only hate to find out that I'm wrong.
wall.gif
 

Another

Forever Learning
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
155
Reaction score
10
Location
SF Bay Area
NYT Review of Shades of Grey

Maureen Dowd reviews Grey at link below. Note comments by Anne Rice ("godmother of vampire and S&M fantasies"), a "phone dominatrix,” and Rutgers professor. Review claims the book follows pretty standard track: mousy, virginal girl falls for rich, powerful man (conventions from Harlequin, it seems), with quality of writing "overwrought." More interesting is the discussion of the implications for female readers, with the eternal wrangling about women as submissive or not down deep, and the significance of S&M fantasies within women, acted out or not. Rice claims very few act out such fantasies, except in northern California where I live. Guess I’ll have to keep a better eye out. Or, I suppose I can await the movie, with rights sold to Universal for $5 million. See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/o...html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=shes fit to be tied&st=cse
 

smp1218

Registered
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Location
Almost to PA, not quite NJ
Website
samanthapetersonyoga.blogspot.com
I'm reading it now after hearing so much about it. I just had to know what the fuss was about! I'm about 100 pages in, and m just not compelled to continue reading. I'll finish it eventually, but it's not the page turner that the news made it out be, at least in my opinion!