- Joined
- Apr 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,940
- Reaction score
- 261
Hell, I cast myself as that role. I've catalogued what I believe his "sins" are above. At a time when "black" cinema happened to be making more and more movies that weren't overtly "black," just solid films that happened to have black people in them, he gave us what in my opinion is pretty close to just being evangelical blaxploitation.
Thanks for the insights. I've heard Perry attacked, but it always seemed like the attacker was grinding their own axe and maybe not giving the guy his right to be an artist, regardless of the fact that art can be disagreeable and annoying but still ... the guy's self-expression, y'know?
Like they were attacking Perry's right to be "a successful black artist" -- How dare he! Well, he dare he because that's what he has within himself to say, and he has worked to have the ability to say it ... and THAT'S why I admire him especially, as an artist with the authority to succeed at his art (even though we can then fairly debate the quality or value or impact of his art, etc)
Anyway ... thanks for the time and insights!
I guess another question (put not just to you, but to all who might care to reply) would be:
Given his success, do we think Tyler Perry is creating the Art that is truely inside him and wants to be self-expressed?
Or did he just know a niche was there that he could fill and so he makes the movies he feels will fulfil his audiences' interests, and bring much success? But maybe isn't as enlightened or cutting-edge or controversial as he might make it? (Though he does inspire controversy, obviously!)
People rightfully protest when every black character is a crack gangsta ... I think that's eroding away and we're seeing a lot of "African American as Joe EveryMan" on TV and movies now.
Being Joe Everyman means they won't be the troubled, dramatic, LEAD CHARACTER though. Those are the supporting roles. Nothing to complain about, really.
I just think when you become the FOCUS of the story, it means they're going to heap alot of drama and conflict on you -- and it's EASY / LAZY to write it if gangsta be shootin' at you or the Man be on your back or ... well ... "be" was meant with affection, it's a purposeful affectation. I recall hearing an interview with a black actor where the white director kept harping on him because he said "is" instead of "be" and the actor says "Look, African Americans say "is" okay? Trust me, it'll be alright." like the white director was having a meltdown because his assumptions were being cross-wired.
My mind wandered, sorry. It's a tricky topic, is what I'm saying. Thanks for explaining!
