Contractions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tim Gasolene

pyromancer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
55
Reaction score
5
Contractions are visual representations of sounds. They are not words. There is no word "can't" nor there is a "won't". Think of it that way and you will understand the rule. And you already know this rule - "dialogue and personal speech you can write any way you like, because this is the way your character speaks."

Now, what is narration? Answer this question and you will know when you can use contractions in narration.

When you narrate the story as The Author, then no contractions can be used. Because The Author speaks the Grammatically Correct Textbook Language. Contractions are the way some people mispronounce words (a contraction means two words were fused together into a shortened mutant of a thing).
Contractions are not the way to speak properly. You will never hear a public speaker use contractions and you will never see contractions in official papers.

Only first person narratives can use contractions anytime and anywhere. Because contractions represent a personal preference in speaking.

Every time you use a contraction, this is a representation of somebody's individual way of speaking. In a piece of creative writing that "somebody" can be either The Author either The Character. But The Author should never put his voice into somebody else's story. Unless the Author Is The Character, as is in memoirs, the Author should be invisible.

Third person narration means the Author can read the characters thoughts and therefore, in rare occasions, when the "voice" of the story demands it, the Author can put in writing exactly what he "hears" from his character. These are most often the occasions of direct representation of the characters thoughts. Check out Stephen King books/stories and see how he deals with it, he often re-tells in narration what his character was thinking.
Most third person narratives, though, are told from an independent "eye in the sky" which speaks The Grammatically Correct Textbook Language. Check Robert Jordan for that.
 

loquax

I verb nouns adverbly
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
1,064
Reaction score
165
Tim Gasolene said:
Contractions are visual representations of sounds. They are not words. There is no word "can't" nor there is a "won't". Think of it that way and you will understand the rule
Err.... I disagree. "Isn't this great?" Is grammatically correct. However, without the contraction it becomes "Is not this great?", which really makes no sense. It is therefore my belief that contractions become their own words.

Edit: Another, better example is "Aren't I the one who told you that?"

"Are not I" is incorrect, as is "I are not".
 
Last edited:

Saundra Julian

A work in progress
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
2,593
Reaction score
664
Location
Atlanta, GA
I agree...depends on the story!
My latest book actually has two story-lines going at the same time.
One is set in the present-day time period and the other takes place in the 1700's.
I use contractions in the first, but not the second ...
 
Last edited:

reph

Fig of authority
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
971
Location
On a fig tree, presumably
Tim Gasolene said:
Contractions are visual representations of sounds. They are not words....

When you narrate the story as The Author, then no contractions can be used. Because The Author speaks the Grammatically Correct Textbook Language.
Excuse me, Tim, but contractions are words. Dictionaries list them alongside the other words. Being visual representations of sounds doesn't disqualify them as words: all words are visual representations of sounds.

A narrator's diction needn't be as formal as a textbook writer's. Sometimes it shouldn't. Earth Abides, by George Stewart, has impersonal narrative written with no contractions. It's terribly stiff and academic, as opposed to relaxed and novelistic, for that reason.
 

JenNipps

Have you JHS today?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
379
Location
south-central Oklahoma
Website
www.jenifernipps.com
Tim Gasolene said:
Contractions are visual representations of sounds. They are not words. There is no word "can't" nor there is a "won't". Think of it that way and you will understand the rule. And you already know this rule - "dialogue and personal speech you can write any way you like, because this is the way your character speaks."

Now, what is narration? Answer this question and you will know when you can use contractions in narration.

When you narrate the story as The Author, then no contractions can be used. Because The Author speaks the Grammatically Correct Textbook Language. Contractions are the way some people mispronounce words (a contraction means two words were fused together into a shortened mutant of a thing).
Contractions are not the way to speak properly. You will never hear a public speaker use contractions and you will never see contractions in official papers.

Only first person narratives can use contractions anytime and anywhere. Because contractions represent a personal preference in speaking.

Every time you use a contraction, this is a representation of somebody's individual way of speaking. In a piece of creative writing that "somebody" can be either The Author either The Character. But The Author should never put his voice into somebody else's story. Unless the Author Is The Character, as is in memoirs, the Author should be invisible.

Third person narration means the Author can read the characters thoughts and therefore, in rare occasions, when the "voice" of the story demands it, the Author can put in writing exactly what he "hears" from his character. These are most often the occasions of direct representation of the characters thoughts. Check out Stephen King books/stories and see how he deals with it, he often re-tells in narration what his character was thinking.
Most third person narratives, though, are told from an independent "eye in the sky" which speaks The Grammatically Correct Textbook Language. Check Robert Jordan for that.

To have such a refined definition/rule of when contraction can and can't -- oh, sorry, can not -- be used would be too restricting. We have to impose all kinds of rules on our writing -- ie world building, characterization, etc. -- that it seems ridiculous and quite counter-productive to be so anal about something so relatively insignficant. I'd -- sorry, I would -- never get anything written if I did that.
 

Sharon Mock

Wing nut
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
455
Reaction score
82
Location
Interstitial
Website
kirizal.livejournal.com
Tim Gasolene said:
When you narrate the story as The Author, then no contractions can be used. Because The Author speaks the Grammatically Correct Textbook Language. Contractions are the way some people mispronounce words (a contraction means two words were fused together into a shortened mutant of a thing).
Contractions are not the way to speak properly. You will never hear a public speaker use contractions and you will never see contractions in official papers.

I hate to dogpile, but....

I did a quick survey of some of my books. Roughly 75%, from J.K. Rowling to Margaret Atwood, used contractions in narrative.

So do at least some public speakers.

Fiction isn't an academic paper or a piece of legislation. There's no substitute for a good ear. Though you need to know "the rules," you also need to know which ones to break, and when.
 

Dawno

Shiny!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
11,261
Reaction score
3,280
Age
69
Location
someplace around here, anyone seen my keys?
From The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. Copyright © 1993 Columbia University Press via Bartleby.com

Standard English employs them as well in writing, although conservative use limits them to Informal writing, and most other Standard use employs them sparingly in Semiformal and rarely or never in Formal writing. But there is nothing wrong with contractions in the right context, and there can sometimes be a good deal wrong without them.
 

victoriastrauss

Writer Beware Goddess
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
6,704
Reaction score
1,318
Location
Far from the madding crowd
Website
www.victoriastrauss.com
Tim Gasolene said:
Every time you use a contraction, this is a representation of somebody's individual way of speaking. In a piece of creative writing that "somebody" can be either The Author either The Character. But The Author should never put his voice into somebody else's story. Unless the Author Is The Character, as is in memoirs, the Author should be invisible.
Nonsense. Authorial voice is often an important component of narrative (what about all those nineteenth century novels in which the author lectures the reader?) It's also a separate issue from the use of contractions, which is a stylistic choice. I don't use contractions in third-person narration--but that's my own personal preference, what feels right to me, and I'm not bothered if other writers make a different choice. Whatever suits the writer's style, and best gets the story across.

I do use contractions in my nonfiction writing (book reviews, articles), to make it more conversational.

- Victoria
 

Albedo of Zero

That didn't hurt
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 15, 2005
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
675
Location
here
(Fido said)
It should be easy to see
The crux of the biscuit
Is the Apostrophe(')
~Frank Zappa (lyrics to Stink Foot)
 

Birol

Around and About
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
14,759
Reaction score
2,998
Location
That's a good question right now.
Tim, can you please let me know where I can get a copy of this all-powerful, all-knowing, never-to-be-contradicted, rule book of yours?

Thanks.
 

ChunkyC

It's hard being green
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
12,297
Reaction score
2,135
Location
trapped between my ears
Tim Gasolene said:
Contractions are visual representations of sounds. They are not words. There is no word "can't" nor there is a "won't". Think of it that way and you will understand the rule. And you already know this rule - "dialogue and personal speech you can write any way you like, because this is the way your character speaks."
As reph pointed out, there certainly are words like can't and won't. Besides, that so-called rule says nothing about contraction usage in narration. To say you can do one thing does not automatically mean you can't do another.
When you narrate the story as The Author, then no contractions can be used.
Sez who? I own and have read cover-to-cover over twenty books on the craft of writing, I have over a dozen dictionaries including legal and medical, half a dozen thesauri, four encyclopaedia in print and electronic form including Britannica and its accompanying dictionary; and I have never, ever run across any 'rule' against using contractions in narration. Please name your source for this 'rule.'
Contractions are not the way to speak properly. You will never hear a public speaker use contractions
You can't make a contention like that unless you've heard every single public speech ever made.
In a piece of creative writing that "somebody" can be either The Author either The Character. But The Author should never put his voice into somebody else's story. Unless the Author Is The Character, as is in memoirs, the Author should be invisible.
I disagree. First, you should get your nomenclature correct. The author is the person who wrote the book. Every word in the book comes from the author. The narrator is the 'voice' the author uses in narration. The narrator can very easily be considered a character, and as such, can have a personality evinced by word choice, including contractions or lack of them.
The Grammatically Correct Textbook Language
What is this supposed to be? In all my reading I've never come across a mention of this 'Grammatically Correct Textbook Language' (googling gets exactly zero hits). Putting statements like that in capitals does not make them 'real.' Regardless, we're concerned with writing novels here, not textbooks.

Tim, you are entitled to your opinion, but please do not barge into a discussion spouting unfounded contentions as though they were the rule of law. Your original post was exceedingly rude:
Whether to use them or not is an established rule. What each of you thinks is irrelevant. The least you can do is stop considering yourself a master of the universe, then go out and check a published book. Such an action will also answer 90% of your other questions on writing.
Uh-huh.
What each of us thinks is irrelevant? Stop considering ourselves master of the universe? How dare you, sir. We were discussing the use of a tool in the writer's arsenal. That's what this entire board is all about. As someone mentioned above, if you don't like the discussion, you don't have to participate. If you do, then the least you can do is show some manners.
 

emeraldcite

Art is Resistance
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
2,466
Reaction score
365
Location
Florida
Website
www.emeraldcite.blogspot.com
A semi-scientific survey

Whether to use them or not is an established rule. What each of you thinks is irrelevant. The least you can do is stop considering yourself a master of the universe, then go out and check a published book. Such an action will also answer 90% of your other questions on writing.
Uh-huh.
I’ve taken a three page sample from each text.


Anne Frasier, Play Dead 2004 -- In dialogue and third person narrative.


Michael Chabon, The Final Solution 2004 -- Only in dialogue.

J.A. Konrath, Whiskey Sour 2004 -- In both 1st person chapters and 3rd person chapters.


Jack McDevitt, Omega 2003 -- In dialogue and 3rd person narrative.


Stephen King, Desperation 1996 -- In dialogue and 3rd person narrative.


David Lodge, Nice Work 1990 -- In dialogue and a few first person sections, but not in third person.


John Irving, The World According to Garp 1978 -- In dialogue and third person narrative.


William Peter Blatty, The Exorcist 1971 -- In dialogue and third person narrative.


Michael Crichton, JurassicPark1990 -- In dialogue and third person narrative.


My results (This is hardly scientific, but considering that 90% of the novels would yield the answer, I will draw a conclusion):


I have taken a sampling of nine well-known authors in various genres from horror to literary. I disqualified one, Martin Amis’ London Fields which is in first person. I was mainly looking for novels with third person narratives.


I have found that in all but Chabon’s novel, contractions were used in third person narrative.





When you narrate the story as The Author, then no contractions can be used. Because The Author speaks the Grammatically Correct Textbook Language.
I did not find this to be true after looking at a sampling of novels that include a number of well-respected literary writers (Chabon, Lodge, and Irving) and several bestselling writers. Now, I may have found the 10% that are not representative of the market, but I will leave that to the discretion of the thread. However, according to your first statement, I should have discovered that your second statement held true...
 

crosseyed reader

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
87
Reaction score
15
ChunkyC said:
Your original post was exceedingly rude...What each of us thinks is irrelevant? Stop considering ourselves master of the universe? How dare you, sir. We were discussing the use of a tool in the writer's arsenal. That's what this entire board is all about. As someone mentioned above, if you don't like the discussion, you don't have to participate. If you do, then the least you can do is show some manners.
Uh, thanks, ChunkyC. As a newbie to this board, I was uncertain as to whether this sort of rudeness was a normal state of affairs. I was sort of ready to take my quill and go home.
 

JenNipps

Have you JHS today?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
379
Location
south-central Oklahoma
Website
www.jenifernipps.com
crosseyed reader said:
Uh, thanks, ChunkyC. As a newbie to this board, I was uncertain as to whether this sort of rudeness was a normal state of affairs. I was sort of ready to take my quill and go home.
Naw, don't let one bad apple spoil the bunch. :)

I thought it was actually a good conversation going.
 

zeprosnepsid

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
90
Location
LA, unfortunately.
As people have said, I think it depends. My book is fantasy, so I don't use them in my narrative. But my main character is a teenager so I do use them in her dialogue. I think this is pretty common.

But really people, in your narration shouldn't you be using significantly more interesting verbs than 'can' and 'will' =) Kidding....mostly...
 

Sage

Our Lady of Parentheticals
Super Moderator
Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
69,336
Reaction score
34,587
Age
46
Location
Cheering you all on!
Even though my books are fantasy & third person, I use contractions. I feel they flow better. But, I have an ulterior motive, which is to offset those times when my mostly silent MC speaks & how formal he sounds.

But now I'm considering whether the scenes from his POV should avoid contractions..., although considering the way he thinks, it might be a moot point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.