Back story through conflict

lalyil

The Lukewarm
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
173
Reaction score
5
Location
UK
Hello again,

I know exposition is.. well, bad, or not great. You don't want to develop a character by having them explaining their past. Also you wouldn't want to overuse flashbacks and dreams I suppose, especially when I don't feel like it fits my script.

I was told that showing the back story through action and conflict is the best, but I'm unsure how to do it and would love it if you could give me examples. It's really confusing me. :)
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
Maybe this is too simple an example, but...

How about Bud White in L.A. Confidential? With just one line of dialogue and one short scene he's intro'd as a guy who hates "wife beaters" and pummels the crap out of any creep who abuses women. Later, when Bud confronts Lynn about her seducing Exley and loses his temper with her, the script says: "the sins of the father are visited on the son" -- which arguably can't be filmed, yet the meaning translates to the screen and the viewing audience gets it. There's Bud's past, neatly explained without showing any details or flashbacks.

-Derek
 

WriteKnight

Arranger Of Disorder
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,746
Reaction score
247
Location
30,000 light years from Galactic Central Point.
Maybe this is too simple an example, but...

How about Bud White in L.A. Confidential? With just one line of dialogue and one short scene he's intro'd as a guy who hates "wife beaters" and pummels the crap out of any creep who abuses women. Later, when Bud confronts Lynn about her seducing Exley and loses his temper with her, the script says: "the sins of the father are visited on the son" -- which arguably can't be filmed, yet the meaning translates to the screen and the viewing audience gets it. There's Bud's past, neatly explained without showing any details or flashbacks.

-Derek


Nailed it.


Basically - conflict is the seed of drama. If you can illuminate backstory, with a moment of drama - it's worth a minute of exposition.
 

JChandlerOates

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
75
Reaction score
7
The best back story

is backstory that stays in the author's mind.
 

creativexec

New kid, be gentle!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
390
Reaction score
49
Location
Los Angeles
Website
twitter.com
Exposition isn't bad at all. Exposition is essential. It's how we learn all the information that's occurred before the story began (or transpired off screen).

It's poorly executed exposition that you want to avoid. You want to find subtle, visual and dramatic ways to introduce exposition and explain away what we must know to understand the unfolding story.

As stated above, if one has an expository scene, it's best to put in the middle of conflict/action instead of simply stopping the story.

However, exposition can be revealed via dialogue - often best when its doled out in pieces. Some here and some there. And the audience eventually has to put it all together by themselves.

Sometimes exposition is revealed in a monologue - like Robert Shaw's USS Indiana speech in JAWS. But the script has been moving full speed ahead up until that point, and it takes a rest with the masterful monologue - having earned the talky moment.
 

lalyil

The Lukewarm
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
173
Reaction score
5
Location
UK
Thanks a lot for the example dpaterso!

And to all of you for the advise. I'm hoping I'll be in the mood to go back and edit a little soon and if not then I'll do that in the second draft. Often going back helps me when I move forward so I rather do these edits while I'm still writing my first draft.