- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 1
Here's something I've noticed. There are currently authors out there who have their work published and it's the first manuscript they ever completed.
It's not a comment about yes, you've obviously improved as a writer because you have the experience of writing more words, but comparatively about an author who only has one or two completed works against a person who has finished 20 manuscripts and still isn't published.
Basically, even though a person may have written more novels and worked longer at writing, I noticed it doesn't necessarily make them a better writer either. It's sad but true. I guess writing does take a certain amount of talent and meeting a publishable standard and having a story that's original that the public would want to read.
Still, I wonder though, are publishers and agents every worried that a writer won't be able to finish that second book and meet a deadline when they've ever only succeeded at completing one book?
The most famous example for having a very successful first novel is Stephenie Meyer. She's never even written a short story before Twilight. Yes, I know people argue that her writing standards are not great but isn't the ultimate point of your story to make readers want more? And no matter how exaggerated her portrayal of Edward was, it definitely seemed to work for the masses.
There are of course other upcoming YA authors like K@t Zh@ng and T@hereh M@fi, the former succeeded with her second ever finished manuscript and I think the latter her first complete manuscript?
Sorry for the long post, but I just wanted to know if anyone has made the same or similar observations?
Some people find success with their first attempt and there are those who try for decades and still can't get published.
It's not a comment about yes, you've obviously improved as a writer because you have the experience of writing more words, but comparatively about an author who only has one or two completed works against a person who has finished 20 manuscripts and still isn't published.
Basically, even though a person may have written more novels and worked longer at writing, I noticed it doesn't necessarily make them a better writer either. It's sad but true. I guess writing does take a certain amount of talent and meeting a publishable standard and having a story that's original that the public would want to read.
Still, I wonder though, are publishers and agents every worried that a writer won't be able to finish that second book and meet a deadline when they've ever only succeeded at completing one book?
The most famous example for having a very successful first novel is Stephenie Meyer. She's never even written a short story before Twilight. Yes, I know people argue that her writing standards are not great but isn't the ultimate point of your story to make readers want more? And no matter how exaggerated her portrayal of Edward was, it definitely seemed to work for the masses.
There are of course other upcoming YA authors like K@t Zh@ng and T@hereh M@fi, the former succeeded with her second ever finished manuscript and I think the latter her first complete manuscript?
Sorry for the long post, but I just wanted to know if anyone has made the same or similar observations?
Some people find success with their first attempt and there are those who try for decades and still can't get published.