Wow. Are you deliberately ignoring the posts where I explicitly state that the cops are wrong and responsible because they failed to render aid once Garner was in custody?
That part was obscured by your overweening insistence in presenting yourself as some sort of forensic authority on the damage done by illegal chokeholds.
Based upon...what, exactly? An uninformed opinion?
Emilander said:Perhaps you should answer Megyn Kelly's question yourself.
No, no. You first.
Emilander said:Questioning claims that the force used was excessive is not trying to spin anything. Claiming that the force used must be excessive because someone died in hindsight, unless you want to argue that the cops intended to kill him, is unfair, in my opinion, because it presumes knowledge available to the officers that they reasonably could not have had.
Once again, I feel that people have been focusing too much on the chokehold, simply because it is a banned action. So when I saw reports that the chokehold didn't do damage, I assumed good faith on the part of the media that it was true and that the medical examiner was the source of the quote. I made a mistake.
Here is where Voltaire's quote, "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities" seems an appropriate response.
I disbelieve the absurd.