I dunno, gettingby. I'm totally with you on the editing sucks thing. Writing is like being able to do magic. Editing is like taking all the courses and practicing the tricks to be a stage magician.
I've seen books with potential turned into brilliant, wonderful books by good editing. There's magic there, surely?
Editing well is difficult. And it's a skill we don't all have, which is why some people find it so dull and confusing. But it's worth doing if you want your book to be the best it can be.
I don't know about trusting your beta, but there is the issue of agreeing with them.
Some betas are great: others, not so much. It helps to have several, if you can find them, as it adds weight to their opinions if they all agree on a particular point.
Perhaps what you need, c.m.n., is more betas. Critting someone else's book is an excellent way to turn on the editing light in your brain.
Yes, and yes. Great advice.
There's kind of a macro and a micro approach to editing. The first focuses on plot and themes, deciding what should be in your story. The second looks at how well you've pulled off the story you told, and focuses on cutting unnecessary adverbs and adjectives, and moments that don't move the plot forward or develop the characters.
When revising or editing, work from big to small. Deal with the big things first, and work your way down to checking punctuation and such. And don't try to do everything in a single pass: it can be done, but it makes the job much harder, and if you're already struggling with it then be easier on yourself.
Read through your manuscript and make notes on what's wrong, and what needs to be changed.
Then look at those notes and see if it's all required, or if making Big Change One smooshes the need to make Slightly Smaller Change Two.
Then go back into your manuscript and make the changes required.
Set it aside for a couple of weeks.
Read through it again, looking for big and medium changes.
When you're certain the plot and structure are working, make your characters stronger, sort out the dialogue and descriptions, strengthen your settings and so on.
Once you've done that, then you go back in and check your grammar, your punctuation, spelling and so on.
Give it a final check by reading through it backwards, one page at a time. This switches off the part of you which follows the story and makes you focus on the small stuff: it's amazing how many errors you'll pick up if you do this.
Stick to the "read through, make notes, read your notes, then make your changes" format at all times--if you find it works for you. Most of the writers I've coached through this find it makes things much easier, as it breaks the huge, wilderness-feeling of revising a whole book into more manageable chunks. But you might find it's too formal for you, in which case, find your own way.
I'm one of those sick, horrible people who generally enjoys the editing process.
I have borderline OCD, just enough to get me in trouble with fractally-interlocking tasks. (One of my favorite jobs was sitting for four hours at a stretch in front of a 3X magnifier and a lightbox, mixing precise Ilfachrome dyes and using a 0000 sable brush to fix .5mm diameter or less holes in Disney film cells. No kidding. OCD bliss.)
I would love that job.
You lucky thing.
So I actually get a kick out of taking something rough and refining it word by word. I even tend to write that way, re-editing a chapter just to get the 'feel' of it before I charge into the next chapter.
This can work well if you're dealing with small stuff as you edit, but for some writers it can cause problems with the big stuff: because you'll have the feeling that you've already edited so there can't be any major issues. But if it works for you, keep doing it.
I keep loads of notes on a separate file, because I won't pretend my memory is strong. It makes my writing process sometimes slower than it should be, but it usually leaves me with better-than-average writing.
I'm beginning to think we're twins.