(trigger warning for rape/sexual abuse, obviously. and please shout if I overstep the mark.)
When I'm on twitter following stuff like PitchWars and Pitchmadness, my favourite question to ask the mentors when the time comes is what the mentors liked, what they were sick of, and what they wanted to see more. Something which has surprised me by turning up multiple times (okay only about twice, but go with me ) is "sexual assault/abuse/rape thrown around only for pathos." On one hand, it's easy to imagine what this could mean - I remember the Shark commenting on a novel where the MC was raped by her dad, who tried to kill her (and succeeded in killing her mother) that the violence felt too jarring and exaggerated, and I admit I winced.
But the concept of using sexual assault "just for pathos" has stuck with me beyond obvious examples. What do you take this to mean, and what can be done to avoid it? Is the answer not to use rape? I mean, preferably, you want a fictional rape victim to be sympathetic because otherwise it could come across as "punishing" an unlikeable character via rape, which is very disturbing.
Nevertheless, I admit I find it unnerving the number of crime novels that trot out the "childlike rape victim", usually a pretty young girl whose sole purpose in the novel is to have been abused by her stepfather - my best friend asked about a YA novel we were both reading, "Do stepfathers exist in fiction solely to rape?" and, while in poor taste, it was a jarring reminder of what is 'expected' from rape, rapists, and rape victims more broadly, but particularly in YA. Certainly an example of "rape for pathos," but I still can't come to a definitive conclusion. I've long wondered if the preference for the 'sadistic jock whom everybody thinks is a handsome charmer' is a variant on the "stranger danger" rape myths.
When I'm on twitter following stuff like PitchWars and Pitchmadness, my favourite question to ask the mentors when the time comes is what the mentors liked, what they were sick of, and what they wanted to see more. Something which has surprised me by turning up multiple times (okay only about twice, but go with me ) is "sexual assault/abuse/rape thrown around only for pathos." On one hand, it's easy to imagine what this could mean - I remember the Shark commenting on a novel where the MC was raped by her dad, who tried to kill her (and succeeded in killing her mother) that the violence felt too jarring and exaggerated, and I admit I winced.
But the concept of using sexual assault "just for pathos" has stuck with me beyond obvious examples. What do you take this to mean, and what can be done to avoid it? Is the answer not to use rape? I mean, preferably, you want a fictional rape victim to be sympathetic because otherwise it could come across as "punishing" an unlikeable character via rape, which is very disturbing.
Nevertheless, I admit I find it unnerving the number of crime novels that trot out the "childlike rape victim", usually a pretty young girl whose sole purpose in the novel is to have been abused by her stepfather - my best friend asked about a YA novel we were both reading, "Do stepfathers exist in fiction solely to rape?" and, while in poor taste, it was a jarring reminder of what is 'expected' from rape, rapists, and rape victims more broadly, but particularly in YA. Certainly an example of "rape for pathos," but I still can't come to a definitive conclusion. I've long wondered if the preference for the 'sadistic jock whom everybody thinks is a handsome charmer' is a variant on the "stranger danger" rape myths.