as is so often the case, this is less about bad taste and more about unrefined palates.
In this instance? Absolutely
Also, she's already dead ...
as is so often the case, this is less about bad taste and more about unrefined palates.
Anyone who thinks that fantasizing about killing a politician is "deranged" behavior has clearly never had much interaction with the average person.
She has every right to write such a story, but those who read it have every right to respond as they have. This is the nature of writing.
I do find her somewhat sick, but probably just more of a fool than anything else. This is not a story I would write, but it's not something I would believe or think or fantasize about, either, so maybe that's the difference.
Anyway, freedom of speech and freedom of expression do not change morality, or and being a writer is no more a license to commit wrong than anyone else has. Being a writer is not special, and comes with no "get out of responsibility free" cards.
I fully support her right to think as she wishes, and to write whatever she wishes. I also support the right of anyone who reads it to think she's a depraved idiot.
I do find the police aspect troubling, but we've had people right here get into serious trouble for writing a story about classroom shootings, and other such things. I suspect a story posted on a blog that's about assassinating Obama might get someone in serious trouble, even though it's fiction.
This is highly troublesome, but personal opinions about us because of what we write are normal, and there's nothing at all wrong with it.
I am not surprised that politicians looking for reasons to be outraged might equate "A piece of fiction about assassinating Margaret Thatcher" with "Fantasizing about assassinating Margaret Thatcher," but it does surprise me that a writer would.
To be fair, Mantel did indicate that seeing Thatcher unguarded was the inspiration for the story.
Sure, but that doesn't mean she was fantasizing about actually doing it.
Gotta disagree, although it's maybe hair-splitting.Well, no, you're either fantasising about it or planning to do it. If you intend to do it, it's no longer a fantasy.
If I saw a politician unguarded, I might think momentarily about how an assassin could have used that moment, but -- given I have zero desire to see anyone hurt -- I'd classify that thought process of mine as "what if" or "catastrophizing" rather than "fantasizing".
There's a significant difference between a "What if?" speculation and an "If only..." desire.
I think it is quibbling . I don't see fantasies as intrinsically pleasant. But either way, what-iffing, whatever you wanna call it, is different from planning something you actually intend to carry out.
I'm wondering if this is a matter of the word "fantasize" being used differently by people in different parts of the world? Where I'm from, the connotation of "fantasy" is definitely "something desired", but I can see it meaning only "something imagined" in other parts of the world. And I notice Buffysquirrel is located on the other side of the Atlantic than me...I agree with jjbenedictis's quibbling, and I don't think it's a quibble - the criticism being leveled at Mantel implies that she was fantasizing about killing Margaret Thatcher in the sense of wishing someone would actually do it. There's a significant difference between a "What if?" speculation and an "If only..." desire.
And the difference is?
Sounds like it was one day over 30 years ago rather than a lifelong obsession.Hilary Mantel has recalled the day in 1983 when she spotted an unguarded Margaret Thatcher from the window of her Windsor flat and fantasised about killing her.
"Immediately your eye measures the distance," she told the Guardian, her finger and thumb forming a gun. "I thought, if I wasn't me, if I was someone else, she'd be dead."
- nineteen eighty-fourThe thought police would get him just the same. He had committed—would have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper—the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you.
People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: vaporized was the usual word.
"What if someone killed Margaret Thatcher?"
"I wish someone would kill Margaret Thatcher."
I'm wondering if this is a matter of the word "fantasize" being used differently by people in different parts of the world? Where I'm from, the connotation of "fantasy" is definitely "something desired", but I can see it meaning only "something imagined" in other parts of the world. And I notice Buffysquirrel is located on the other side of the Atlantic than me...
Possibly. Again, a semantic issue.