- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 5
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Website
- thegoodtypist.blogspot.com
I have a slightly philosophical question regarding a minor but important character in my book. My MC has an older sister who is annoyingly perfect, smart, wealthy, and together. She's very critical of the MC, but she also does a lot to help her--lends her money, connects her to important contacts, and helps her with business planning. Towards the end of the book, it's revealed that the sister's seemingly perfect life has some major cracks, and that she is not as strong and together as she seems. This "reveal" happened unconsciously during the writing process, and now I feel a little bit ambivalent about it. A part of me wants the sister to be exactly who she appears to be, because in being who she is, she helps the MC realize her goals. I want the sister be enough just as she is in her charmed and sheltered life.
But another part of me really wants her to have these major cracks in her life, partly to show the self-centeredness of the MC in never digging more deeply to understand her sister, and partly because it feels cathartic to have an eye-rollingly perfect character fall to pieces. I'm just not sure at this point which choice is more honest. Have you run into a similar situation in your work? How did you address it?
But another part of me really wants her to have these major cracks in her life, partly to show the self-centeredness of the MC in never digging more deeply to understand her sister, and partly because it feels cathartic to have an eye-rollingly perfect character fall to pieces. I'm just not sure at this point which choice is more honest. Have you run into a similar situation in your work? How did you address it?