So this may take some explaining so stay with me. I am currently writing my second novel and within the next year or two I will be done. I have already been kicking around ideas for book 3 which will be a departure from books 1 and 2 which were science-fiction/horror. Book 3 will be about a terrorist group made up of people who are living in/citizens of the USA and are plotting to carry out a terror plot using crude chemical weapons. The book will follow one person from inception of the plan to the aftermath of his actions.
Now for the question part. I work in a field where I have a lot of experience with what I will be writing about and that will be great for an authentic and very believable story. The problem is this (and if I'm totally off base, please tell me): I don't want my book, which would theoretically take the reader through the entire process of forming a terrorist group, making and then setting off weapons, to be an "Anarchist's Cookbook" for a real group of crazy people to do the same.
Does that make sense? Has anyone else been hesitant to write/publish a book that others could use as a blueprint for bad things?
Now for the question part. I work in a field where I have a lot of experience with what I will be writing about and that will be great for an authentic and very believable story. The problem is this (and if I'm totally off base, please tell me): I don't want my book, which would theoretically take the reader through the entire process of forming a terrorist group, making and then setting off weapons, to be an "Anarchist's Cookbook" for a real group of crazy people to do the same.
Does that make sense? Has anyone else been hesitant to write/publish a book that others could use as a blueprint for bad things?