Here's the
PDF of the 2009 report. The one Sheriff Glanz says he thought concluded Bates received "no special treatment." Spoiler alert: He did.
Going by that report Sheriff Glanz and his boys, Chief Albin and Captain Huckeby should all be charged with... I don't know,
something!
Favouritism towards Bates, harassing people into lying and faking reports, bullying people to work extra 'part-time' work, (which I gather is after-hours security work?).
And really, who is going to want sheriffs to provide a security presence? That's right, Glanz's rich buddies. Want to bet he gets them a deal on the price?
I'm thinking the only obvious boxes left to tick are sexual harassment, and bribes (other than cars and cash from Bates) from his deputies to get good assignments, and the public to get their crimes overlooked, but, hey, the guy doing the report probably had a deadline.
And in the case of Bates, they knew the problems in 2009, and knew that other people knew, and still they thought they'd be fine?