Alright guys, I'm finally going to learn how to use a semicolon. So would this be correct?
I've finally learned how to use a semicolon; it's wonderful.
I've finally learned how to use a semicolon; it's wonderful.
Alright guys, I'm finally going to learn how to use a semicolon. So would this be correct?
I've finally learned how to use a semicolon; it's wonderful.
The best lesson I ever saw on semicolons: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/semicolon
Alright guys, I'm finally going to learn how to use a semicolon. So would this be correct?
I've finally learned how to use a semicolon; it's wonderful.
TopHat
Guttersquid demonstrated that your use of a semicolon was correct with his example, which also has two separate but related ideas.
TopHat
Guttersquid demonstrated that your use of a semicolon was correct with his example, which also has two separate but related ideas.
I was thinking that my "It's wonderful" would be related to my first clause.
I agree with all Guttersquid says--except the first sentence. I also think Tophat's example makes the cut for sufficient relationship in the two main clauses and, thus, correctness.
I was thinking that my "It's wonderful" would be related to my first clause.
Yes, the ideas are related, but they're two separate ideas. In such cases sentences would be better served with either a period or a coordinating conjunction.
I finally learned how to use a semicolon. It's wonderful.
I finally learned how to use a semicolon, and it's wonderful.
Using semicolons when they meet the minimum "requirement" of joining two independent clauses reduces their effectiveness. Restricting their use to expressing a single idea maximizes their effectiveness and helps prevent overuse, something I believe we all agree is a good thing.
That's how it read for me also.
If you feel uncomfortable with semicolons, then you might want to read essays and letters by Jonathan Swift and others of that era. Back in those primitive times people weren't afraid to use semicolons.
I agree with all Guttersquid says--except the first sentence. I also think Tophat's example makes the cut for sufficient relationship in the two main clauses and, thus, correctness.
Thank you so much for this!!! I love the oatmeal but never saw this. Guhhhhhh!!!
ps What's a "comma splice?"
From the context it seems like it's when two "independent clauses" are joined with a comma when a semicolon would be the thing to use.
Couldn't say for sure though
Yep. If you're using a comma where you need a semicolon or a period/full stop, it's a comma splice.
I got up late that day. Everyone was at work. <-- two sentences. Totally fine.
I got up late that day; everyone was at work. <-- The two clauses are related enough that a semicolon works.
I got up late that day, everyone was at work. <-- comma splice. Using this will make many grammarians wince.