As Victoria---this thread's moderator---already pointed out, WOW, you have an odd fixation on RR and frankly, I think you seem bent on stirring things up about this publisher for no good reason whatsoever.
If you have legitimate questions about RR's administrative operations, its contract, its personnel, its sales, etc, that's one thing, but you don't. You're instead splitting hairs about what you think the journalists who are writing _about_ RR have in their heads when they are doing press coverage. That's not in the spirit of this thread, IMHO. It belongs on a wisecracking blog or something similar, not a fact-checking thread.
Not only is it annoying, it's getting in the way of anyone who's looking for serious background info on this publisher via this thread.
If you have legitimate questions about RR's administrative operations, its contract, its personnel, its sales, etc, that's one thing, but you don't. You're instead splitting hairs about what you think the journalists who are writing _about_ RR have in their heads when they are doing press coverage. That's not in the spirit of this thread, IMHO. It belongs on a wisecracking blog or something similar, not a fact-checking thread.
Not only is it annoying, it's getting in the way of anyone who's looking for serious background info on this publisher via this thread.