Six inches here yesterday, but all melted now. Sorry you're still dealign with it. Just so you know, more's coming Wednesday night in Colorado, so you might have more on Friday.
The poem today is one of those pieces of magical writing that starts on a mundane note and builds ineluctably to a final line that punches a hole of sweetness in my heart.
So that's where I am today, trying to paint "Starry Night" again, trying to re-imagine stuff I thought I had already imagined. I have developed a bit more admiration for musicians and actors who try to bring different takes to the same words, as I am struggling with it a bit.
That quote doesn't link to Starry Night
No, but there are other things he did paint over and over again.
Well, yes - but not the Starry Night. And I really think that it is a singularity. I really do.
Well, sure, but Starry Night was just an example in the greater point:
"A painter does a painting, and he paints it and he paints it, and that's it, you know."
Possibly. But I wouldn't have thought JM was being that simplistic. I'd have thought she was extending her argument by mentioning a specific painting that was singular in both senses.
Perhaps I don't understand what she was trying to say then.
Possibly. But I wouldn't have thought JM was being that simplistic. I'd have thought she was extending her argument by mentioning a specific painting that was singular in both senses.