Time in the legal system has a lot more in common with eons than with hours or even days.
Figure AT LEAST a month, possibly as many as six months, from the time the last permitted document is filed with respect to the motion before the court rules on the motion. Although I'm a little surprised how much back and forth there's been; at least in the state courts I'm more familiar with, there's the defendant's motion, the plaintiff's response, and -- only with court approval, if the plaintiff raised issues not anticipated in the original motion -- the defendant's response to the plaintiff's response. Nothing more than that. Parties are really supposed to anticipate their opponents' arguments, so there isn't interminable back-and-forthing.
In this case, if I remember correctly, we've had the original motion, the plaintiff's response, the plaintiff's new response by a new attorney, the defendant's response to the plaintiff's response, and now the pro-se plaintiff's response to that, and soon another response by the defendant. I wouldn't be surprised if the pro-se plaintiff then at least tried to file yet another response, and as has been seen by the judge's waiver of the page-count rule, the courts usually give pro-se parties leeway, especially on purely technical rules (as opposed to legal issues).
JD, not giving individual legal advice, just general information