Thought I'd start this as a discussion of the things you've found in your research, used in your writing or ran across in historical fiction that you thought were anachronisms, which aren't.
The inspiration for this thread is that I was reading the opening of Maureen Gibbon's Paris Red and there on the first page her first-person narrator casually mentions switchblades -- in the 1860s. That pulled me right out of the scene as they just seemed to be almost a century too early (since they're so associated with 1950's hoodlums, etc.). But my Google-fu shows that apparently switchblades did in fact exist in 19th century France, very similar to the modern design. (Also that people collect antique switchblades...)
What else has surprised you?
The inspiration for this thread is that I was reading the opening of Maureen Gibbon's Paris Red and there on the first page her first-person narrator casually mentions switchblades -- in the 1860s. That pulled me right out of the scene as they just seemed to be almost a century too early (since they're so associated with 1950's hoodlums, etc.). But my Google-fu shows that apparently switchblades did in fact exist in 19th century France, very similar to the modern design. (Also that people collect antique switchblades...)
What else has surprised you?