I think for a new company start-up, they have exactly what we would generally suggest before a person submits, large, experienced staff, capital, good contracts and pay structures, and so on.
The usual red flags that we warn people away from don't apply here. That doesn't mean that it isn't always a good idea to wait a year or two before submitting to a new publisher, but as new publishers go, this is one of two really good ones that are doing it right from the start that I've seen since I started lurking in these threads. That says a lot.
The author above wasn't just saying "they want to publish my book so I'll go with them even if there are potential warning signs." What he said was that compared to the other really crappy epublishers he'd come across, this was one that appeared to be doing it right and so he was willing to give them a try.
Many authors on this site who know good and well how to avoid the shoddy publishers are submitting to Musa not because they just want to be published, but because they recognize experience and believe that this company, unlike most others, is worth taking a risk on.
Now, we might find that they've bitten off more than they can chew, but we might also find that they do amazingly and take off and in a few years are considered one of the best epublishers to submit to.
This isn't quite the same as people who send their work to publishers just because they're excited or naive or what not, Amadan. It's a calculated risk. Perhaps it's not a risk you would be willing to take, but it strikes me as a more worthwhile risk than most other epublishers out there.
I actually think, if anything, that you're seeing a lot of intelligent, well-researched individuals going here simply because, as mentioned above, it's refreshing to see a new company that doesn't have all of those normal red flags.