Sesselja said:
I never set intended to read mostly men, yet I seem to do so. Is it just coincidence? Do men cover different topics than women? Write differently? Have better publicists? Get less prejudice? Recieve more attention?
All I can safely conclude is this: The set of authors represented by your bookshelf overlaps closely the set of authors that best match your particular tastes. To try to make any claims about writing quality based on your reading preferences is to mistake your opinion for objective fact.
(This has been excerpted from page 37 from Niki's book, How To Apply Your "people mistaking their own preferences for Universal Truth" Pet Peeve To Every Possible Discussion On AW. Forthcoming, Feb 2007, Doubleday.
)
rwam said:
I think there's some merit to this question, actually. I heard/read somewhere that men are generally better at reading maps than women. If it's true that men's brains are wired differently than women's brains, then maybe men are better at writing some kinds of things than women....generally speaking.
Yes, even if it's true, what does one plan to do with this information?
"Men are better than women at writing. Therefore..."
Therefore Kvelkane wants to perform preliminary publishing triage based on the presence of a Y chromosome.
Bad!
Therefore readers who believe this to be true perform purchasing triage based on the presence of a Y chromosome.
Bad!
Therefore writing teachers who believe this to be true will encourage male writers and discourage female writers.
Bad!
Therefore a woman who might have pursued a career in fiction will, once convinced that men are better fiction writers than women--or at least convinced that publishers, editors, and agents are convinced of it--subsume her aspirations into something else, like journalism or copy-editing or teaching.
Really bad!
Even if "men are better fiction writers than women" were
true, I can't think of a single good use to put that fact to. I can only see it being used as a bludgeon to beat on women's heads with. And that's just plain bad.
So, with that in mind, what possible merit is there to this question? Seriously?