Birth control in 1940s

kelliewallace

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
432
Reaction score
86
Location
Sydney, Australia
I've done a bit of research on it and found some women used Lysol. Was there any other forms of contraception during the 40s?
 

Siri Kirpal

Swan in Process
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
3,151
Location
In God I dwell, especially in Eugene OR
Sat Nam! (literally "Truth Name"--a Sikh greeting)

There were condoms, spermacides and cervical caps (exact name of which I forget). All those were still available when the pill and IUD became available. ETA: For me, this isn't history. My parents used those things.

Not to mention abstinence.

Blessings,

Siri Kirpal
 

Nekko

Back to purring
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
2,602
Reaction score
565
Location
In a quiet corner, on fluffy cushions
Website
www.gericopitch.com
There would have been several common methods, as well as many so-so herbal ones. (so-so because some were/are more effective than others)

Planned Parenthood has actually put together an easy to read paper on historical contraceptives. You might want to check it out.

I'm bookmarking it myself!

Just to keep things clear: while IUDs in some form have been around since the early 1900's, the pill didn't come out until 1963
 

Chase

It Takes All of Us to End Racism
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
9,239
Reaction score
2,316
Location
Oregon, USA
In 1940, my good Catholic folks used the rhythm method. Didn't work.

Chase, born June 23, 1941
 

Lil

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
867
Reaction score
155
Location
New York
I think the most common form of contraception at that time, at least in the US, was the diaphragm.
 

mayqueen

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
4,624
Reaction score
1,548
You might get Andrea Tone's book Devices and Desires: A History of Contraceptives in America. I haven't read it, but it sounds like it might be a good resource.
 

thothguard51

A Gentleman of a refined age...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
9,316
Reaction score
1,064
Age
72
Location
Out side the beltway...
There would have been several common methods, as well as many so-so herbal ones. (so-so because some were/are more effective than others)

Planned Parenthood has actually put together an easy to read paper on historical contraceptives. You might want to check it out.

I'm bookmarking it myself!

Just to keep things clear: while IUDs in some form have been around since the early 1900's, the pill didn't come out until 1963

Very interesting article. Saved for future references...

Thank you
 

Nekko

Back to purring
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
2,602
Reaction score
565
Location
In a quiet corner, on fluffy cushions
Website
www.gericopitch.com
I know it's been a while since kelliewallace first made this thread, but since it's resurfaced...

I think the most common form of contraception at that time, at least in the US, was the diaphragm.

The idea of blocking the cervix to prevent pregnancy is thousands of years old. Various cultures have used cervix-shaped devices such as oiled paper cones or lemon halves, or have made sticky mixtures that include honey or cedar rosin to be applied to the cervical opening.[33] However, the diaphragm—which stays in place because of the spring in its rim, rather than hooking over the cervix or being sticky—is of much more recent origin. (late 1880s it seems)

Diaphragms played a role in overturning the federal Comstock Act (in America).This act prohibited sending contraceptive devices, or information about contraception, through the mail. In 1932, American birth control activist Margaret Sanger arranged for a Japanese manufacturer to mail a package of diaphragms to a New York physician who supported Sanger's activism. U.S. customs confiscated the package, and Sanger helped file a lawsuit. In 1936, in the court case United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries, a federal appellate court ruled that the package could be delivered.[33]

Although in Europe, the cervical cap was more popular than the diaphragm, the diaphragm became one of the most widely used contraceptives in the United States. In 1940, one-third of all U.S. married couples used a diaphragm for contraception.

It would be fun to weave the Comstock act into a storyline :e2writer:
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,122
Reaction score
10,882
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Here are some links about contraception in the good old days:

http://www.case.edu/affil/skuyhistcontraception/online-2012/Cervical-Caps-Diaphragms.html

http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/health-info/a-brief-history-of-birth-control/

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=52188



They had diaphragms, condoms and spermicides in the 1940s, but they also had some really ineffective stuff going on, and yes, Lysol was one of them. Plus, there were the Comstock laws and others, which made contraception illegal in some locales. In fact, when my parents moved to Boston in the early 1960s, contraception was illegal there, and the only health care provider my mom could find to provide her with a diaphragm was Planned Parenthood.

Birth control was not nearly as reliable as it is today, but still, the birth rate fell by half in the early part of the 20th century.
From Wikipedia Laboratory testing of substances to see if they inhibited sperm motility began in the 1800s. Modern spermicides nonoxynol-9 and menfegol were developed from this line of research.[29] However, many other substances of dubious contraceptive value were also promoted. Especially after the prohibition of contraception in the U.S. by the 1873 Comstock Act, spermicides—the most popular of which was Lysol—were marketed only as "feminine hygiene" products and were not held to any standard of effectiveness. Worse, many manufacturers recommended using the products as a douche after intercourse, too late to affect all the sperm. Medical estimates during the 1930s placed the pregnancy rate of women using many over-the-counter spermicides at seventy percent per year.[31]