That RH was outed was wrong (whatever the circs, it's not all that clear yet) imo. Because now she's getting abused -- and abuse is abuse. I can't just say it;s OK because of who the person on the receiving end is. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Just playing devil's advocate here...
If someone is breaking the law..
You alert the authorities and let them handle it
It's illegal where I am to do at least half the things you said he did
So, uh, very relevant?
I too had problems with The Wind Up Girl frex (RH seems to have deleted that review along with many others....) but I don't think it merits (IIRC - I may be mixing up authors here) a shot of acid in the face.
Not true here, so the courts have ruled. At least not if the creepshots occur in "public space." A good reason not to wear skirts.Creepshots -- taking photos, especially of an intimate nature, without the subject's permission -- illegal
If the reporter had concerns about the rest (and he should have)he should have reported them to the authorities (and was frankly remiss if he did not do so)
Basically, he was a vigilante. And we know how well that works.
What did he do that's illegal where you're from? The underage girls in the subreddits wore clothes.
Not true here, so the courts have ruled. At least not if the creepshots occur in "public space." A good reason not to wear skirts.
http://www.ibtimes.com/texas-upskir...creepshot-privacy-statutes-face-legal-1691321