Shouldn't it have a carved effigy on top? He died in battle. Doesn't that mean his feet get to rest on a lion?
Hear hear!
Shouldn't it have a carved effigy on top? He died in battle. Doesn't that mean his feet get to rest on a lion?
I think that what is or is not on the tomb depends on the cost. Having a carved effigy could make it, imo, a target for the vandal and the souvenir hunter. I am not sure about the significance of animals on tombs.
I was told (don't know if it's true) that in English funeral effigies, (such as those all the kings and queens got), if the feet are resting on a lion (symbol of courage and valor) the person died in battle. Otherwise their feet rest on a dog (symbol of faith, i.e. the common old dog name "Fido")
This is kind of random, sort of, but Philippa Gregory's novel The White Queen I believe deals with the subject of King Richard III and the princes in the tower. It's supposed to be made into a miniseries on BBC. I thought the book was good, but I know Ms. Gregory has a way of running away with historical facts. If the series does come to the US, I do plan on watching it.
Has anyone else read The White Queen? I thought it was good.
Maybe they're worried about anti-Ricardians, if there is such a term (there is now! ) coming in and defacing the statue. Or they're worried about the cost. When was the last time a king of England was buried with an effigy and all that? Stonecarvers charge a lot more now.I think that what is or is not on the tomb depends on the cost. Having a carved effigy could make it, imo, a target for the vandal and the souvenir hunter. I am not sure about the significance of animals on tombs.
Maybe he could have his feet on the lion and his head on the white boar.
Leicester Cathedral confirm £1 million tomb for Richard.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23355604
Leicester Cathedral confirm £1 million tomb for Richard.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23355604
Given that the Minster has said that they do not want Richard the judicial review results could be interesting if the decision is for York Minster. I spoke to a journalist who works for the Yorkshire Post and he would not be drawn on what would happen. Though he did agree with me that finding a place to bury Richard in the Minster could be problematical.
LOL! "A little little grave, an obscure grave . . ." struck me as being funny in the light of the plans for re-internment!
The May/June issue of British Archaeology has a cover story withthe headline Richard III: The Back Story and a picture of his spine!
Oh! It's going to rest on an inlaid white rose. (Tearing up here.)
Hate to sound like an old hippy but couldn't they throw some of that money towards helping spinal research? He's been under that parking lot for a long time. Surely he'd settle for a couple of thousand dollars for a simple tombstone--s6
Check out the University of Leicester add on the back. It says something like "We found Richard III. Who will you find." (And I must say, the drawing of Richard III is kinda hawt... If you like lean, moody warriors with longish hair. And who doesn't?!)Groan! Back story. Groan. Though it looks interesting, may try to get a copy.
They have a point. If somebody had ever said "Make sure you go to the Leicester when you next visit England," I would have said "Is that where they make that sauce?" OK, not quite, but it wouldn't have been on top of my tourist destinations. But...Shakey I had a similar thought, that the money could be better spent. Leicester is going all out for tourism and making money from the discovery. Museum and what have you - I think there is even a fly over of the battle field. I suppose that those spending the money will consider is an investment as it will bring jobs to the city.
Archaeologists have discovered a mysterious coffin-within-a-coffin from the same Leicester car park where England's King Richard III was famously buried for 500 years.
Experts returned to the site of the former Grey Friars Church at the beginning of July to learn more about the area, only to find a full intact stone casket with a lead coffin inside.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/double-...-grave-site-20130730-2qvhb.html#ixzz2aTj6SYeL
Meanwhile, back at the car park...
.
http://abcnews.go.com/Weird/wireStory/uk-court-richard-iii-buried-leicester-23838451In the battle royal over Richard III's bones, Britain's High Court has given the victory to Leicester.
The court ruled Friday that the 15th-century monarch should be buried in the city in central England where his skeleton was found under a parking lot in 2012.
A group of distant relatives had wanted Richard interred in the northern England city of York, to which he had strong ties.
Calling the case "unique and exceptional," three judges ruled there were no grounds to overturn the government's decision to grant a burial license to Leicester. Richard's remains are due to be enshrined in the city's cathedral.