Recently I did a chat for a local romance writer's group which ended up being attended by more people than I'd envisaged. It was fun, and I was able to answer lots of questions which were e-mailed to me in advance. However, on the night several people wanted to know whether it's better to publish with only one or two publishers, or to spread those 'eggs' into as many baskets as possible. This, because I mentioned that e-publishers spring up all the time and many, sadly, do not make it past a year or two. Or they self-combust leaving writers in a very bad place (e.g.Noble Romance). I wasn't able to answer this eggs and baskets question very well, being newly published (two different pubs but it's early days). In March I'm doing another, bigger talk about e-publishing in general and this question might arise again. I'd greatly appreciate any perspective about pros and cons of sticking with one/two houses or spreading books to five/six...more? Seems like it would be awfully complicated, what with different author loops, expectations to write more for each house to build the brand, etc. But maybe I'm wrong?
Thanks for the help!
Thanks for the help!
Last edited: