it's that these are deaf dancers dancing in time to each other through the music which us hearing audience members can tell has a strong beat but the dancers themselves wouldn't really know.
Hmm.... I missed that one, I think. Which year was it? It'd be good to find out if it's available on YouTube or on the station's website. Do you have a link handy? If not, it's okay; I can look for it.
I went ahead and looked for it. There are a bunch of links under "chinese deaf dancers" and it's simply stunning.
I can never think too badly of mankind when I see works of art such as this. When we can dream of this and make it a reality, it can't be all that bad.
"chinese deaf dancer"
What you do is you raise your hands in the air above your head and you wriggle your fingers. . . .
I'm late to the party (but I brought ice!). I've discussed TTY with the overly-chatty employees at the local video store, who report it's more usual to experience problems than to have it go smoothly for their deaf customers. (There's a large deaf community here, with a college for the deaf.) After asking Chase about texting, I thought to follow up at the video store, and yes, the employees who text find it much better than TTY. The owner, however, doesn't quite 'get' texting and still uses TTY.In another thread, Maryn asked if texting has served to integrate the deaf community into the mainstream.
My answer was too brief and dodged the issue, because I still can’t find anything close to a deaf community in my town.
However, for all of us deaf and profoundly hard of hearing--especially those isolated as I am--texting has been a terrific tool for communicating with the hearing world.
Before the ability to text on cellular phones, we had TTY. It’s known by other names elsewhere, but its operation requires a TTY unit hooked to a land-line telephone on both ends, or at minimum a TTY operator in the middle. The system was plagued with problems, not the least of which were public places claiming to offer the service but which had few staff who knew how to use it. In one library, the equipment was still in the box under the desk where a sign said they had a TTY telephone. Also many, many businesses then and now flatly refuse to take TTY calls.
I’ve used both Montana and Oregon Relay for the Deaf (deaf folks like me who can speak). This requires a special land-line phone with a readout screen on my end, and we go through a relay operator who types out what the person on the other end says. Even though the LCD screen is only a quarter-inch by three inches and quickly scrolls all capital letters, it was a terrific way to stay in touch with hearing friends and family without them having special equipment other than a telephone. There were some problems with businesses hanging up on calls, but a persistent operator (most all of whom are wonderful advocates for the deaf) usually managed to get us through.
Text phones are even better. More and more people have them, and more and more owners are learning to text. Back in the days of ten-key phones, I taught my boss, co-workers, and some friends how to text--often against their wills, ha ha ha.
With today’s instant send photos and full miniature keyboards, the communications for deafies with hearies gets ever better and better.
Which brings up another question from anignoranthearie. Are DVD subtitles sufficient for movie comprehension and enjoyment? How do subtitles differ from closed captioning?
What are your equivalents to rhyme, word play & tongue twisters?
The subtitling I'm talking about isn't closed caption . . . the subtitles I'm talking about are not optional. . . .
The other thing it does not do is bring up each word separately as the person says them.
Do you have any suggestions for what to do (or not do) if someone's trying to learn some ASL on their own?