I've seen them lots of places recently, even in AW posts, but I decided not to say anything (unless it's in SYW, where I recall seeing one, but I think someone else had already pointed it out to the writer). The pattern is to have one or more sentence fragments following a complete sentence where they would be grammatically correct as a single sentence. Like this. And like in the title.
Does this annoy anyone else as much as it does me?
I've seen these in news stories, but I just came across this quite egregious example:
Out of ‘hobby’ class, drones lifting off for personal, commercial use
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ass-drones-lifting-off-for-personal/?page=all
This is the tenth paragraph:
Is there some strange, sudden change in modern English that makes this acceptable?
I wasn't sure where to post this. It might fit in Grammar and Syntax, but it might also fit in Politics and Current Events, as it does seem to be a "current event."
Does this annoy anyone else as much as it does me?
I've seen these in news stories, but I just came across this quite egregious example:
Out of ‘hobby’ class, drones lifting off for personal, commercial use
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ass-drones-lifting-off-for-personal/?page=all
This is the tenth paragraph:
There it is, FOUR sentence fragments as "follow-ons" to an actual sentence.Soon, experts predict, drones will be used to transport air cargo. Assist with search-and-rescue. Perform police surveillance. Inspect oil pipelines and sprawling vineyards. Follow and photograph tabloid targets such as Lindsay Lohan.
Is there some strange, sudden change in modern English that makes this acceptable?
I wasn't sure where to post this. It might fit in Grammar and Syntax, but it might also fit in Politics and Current Events, as it does seem to be a "current event."