"And" connects two parts of sentence, creates confusion?

pellshek

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
56
Reaction score
7
Hi all,

The sentence in quote tags below is bugging me.

Hero is woken up when the phone rings. He answers it, still half asleep, and I have a short para describing his senses slowly coming round. That para starts:

He rubbed his eyes and the world – his bedroom – started emerging from the gloom.

It's the first part of the sentence that's at issue. Does it read as:

a) "He rubbed his eyes and he rubbed the world..."

or

b) "He rubbed his eyes and as a result the world started emerging..."

Obviously I'm trying to say b) but I have a feeling it might read as a).

This is one of those problems where the sentence has been in my MS for so long that I'm struggling to see what it actually says as opposed to seeing what I think it says, or what I mean it to say.

Many thanks.
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
You need a comma before the 'and;' you've got two independent clauses.

You could alternately eliminate your confusion by killing the 'and,' and sticking in a semicolon.
 

Osulagh

Independent fluffy puppy.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
1,488
Reaction score
222
Location
My dog house.
What Cornflake said. A comma before "and" creates greater separation. You can also use a different conjunction that relates sequence of events, like "then" or even " , and then". "and as a result" is a bit too obvious for me, and a semi-colon--even though I love them--feels too jarring for me.
 

Chase

It Takes All of Us to End Racism
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
9,239
Reaction score
2,316
Location
Oregon, USA
He rubbed his eyes[,] and the world – his bedroom – started emerging from the gloom.

Here's the comma rule Cornflake referred to (as edited above and with examples below):

Comma Rule Number 1: A comma is necessary to separate a compound structure, two or more main clauses joined by one of the seven coordinating conjunctions: and, or, nor, but, for, yet, so.

The woman drank black coffee, and she ate a croissant.
You can conduct yourself in a pleasant manner, or you can be horrible.
Evan loves Suzanne, but he cannot forget Elena.


If a writer chooses to make those constructions into simple sentences, then the comma is not used:

The woman drank black coffee and ate a croissant.
You can conduct yourself in a pleasant manner or be horrible.
Evan loves Suzanne but cannot forget Elena.


Your sentence obviously requires compound construction. As Cornflake also suggested, a compound method without a comma and coordinating conjunction employs a semicolon:

He rubbed his eyes; the world – his bedroom – emerged from the gloom.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,116
Reaction score
10,870
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Yep, you need a comma before and. This is a pretty good illustration of why these rules exist. As cornflake said, you can also change it to a sentence with a semicolon, or even just turn it into two short sentences.

You couldn't use a then there (without an and), because "then" cannot function as a coordinating conjunction by itself. Some people dislike "and then" constructs, but they're not technically incorrect.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Yep, you need a comma before and. This is a pretty good illustration of why these rules exist.

Exactly, and it is a most excellent example. So excellent, in fact, that I'm going to use it in my English comp class tomorrow. I collect stuff like this for class purposes.

The major point I intend to emphasize, by using this, is that punctuation does matter. Punctuation rules didn't get to be there because some influential academic said they should be. They got to be there because they facilitate written communication.

As to the specific example, my personal preference would be to eliminate the conjunction, and use a semicolon. I know there are people who DETEST semicolons, including one of our more prominent commenters on grammar and style issues here at AW, but they exist because they also serve a communicative purpose. The sentence in the OP is a perfect example of where one could be used appropriately.

Other than the punctuational glitch, that sentence is quite a good one, by the way.

caw
 
Last edited:

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,116
Reaction score
10,870
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Exactly, and it is a most excellent example. So excellent, in fact, that I'm going to use it in my English comp class tomorrow. I collect stuff like this for class purposes.

The major point I intend to emphasize, by using this, is that punctuation does matter. Punctuation rules didn't get to be there because some influential academic said they should be. They got to be there because they facilitate written communication.

As to the specific example, my personal preference would be to eliminate the conjunction, and use a semicolon. I know there are people who [ib]DETEST[/b] semicolons, including one of our more prominent commenters on grammar and style issues here at AW, but they exist because they also serve a communicative purpose. The sentence in the OP is a perfect example of where one could be used appropriately.

Other than the punctuational glitch, that sentence is quite a good one, by the way.

caw

I don't care for semicolons as a rule (I tend to default to two short sentences myself). But I think this is an example of a place where one works, because the second clause happens as a direct consequence of the first one, and a semicolon makes that clear.

And anyone who says they're never used in modern fiction is wrong, because I've noticed their occasional use in the past three novels I've read, and each of these has been published within the past couple years.

The thing is, you can take the same information and craft a dozen or more correctly punctuated sentences that get it across. None will necessarily be better than the others.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
And anyone who says they're never used in modern fiction is wrong, because I've noticed their occasional use in the past three novels I've read, and each of these has been published within the past couple years.

Anyone who says semicolons aren't used anymore isn't reading enough. They are commonly used in current fiction and nonfiction.

caw
 

pellshek

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
56
Reaction score
7
Many thanks to everyone for help, esp. Chase for digging out that rule for me. Appreciated.

Exactly, and it is a most excellent example. So excellent, in fact, that I'm going to use it in my English comp class tomorrow. I collect stuff like this for class purposes.

Delighted to hear that.

Other than the punctuational glitch, that sentence is quite a good one, by the way.

Nice to hear. I like the slight hint of mock heroism to it. We go from world > bedroom in the blink, or rub, of an eye. This is appropriate for the character in question.