A "capacious" tree?

Brad

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
83
Reaction score
6
Would it be awkward to say that a certain tree is "capacious" because it holds a lot of water? It seems like capacious is usually applied to large enclosures or wide open spaces, but I am trying to emphasize the amount of empty space within the tree.

"While the Baobab tree appears solid, it is in fact extremely capacious. Within its trunk alone it stores up to 25,000 gallons of water".
 

alleycat

Still around
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
72,919
Reaction score
12,277
Location
Tennessee
I think it would be technically acceptable, but it does seem like an unusual term to apply to a tree.

An alternate would be voluminous.

Or you could rewrite the sentence; something like: While the baobab tree appears solid, much of it's bulk is made up of water. Within its trunk a large baobab can stores up to 25,000 gallons of water. (Offered as an example only.)

Baobab wouldn't be capitalized, by the way.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Or you could rewrite the sentence; something like: While the baobab tree appears solid, much of it's bulk is made up of water. Within its trunk a large baobab can stores up to 25,000 gallons of water. (Offered as an example only.)

Baobab wouldn't be capitalized, by the way.

And its should have no apostrophe.

I agree, though, that the first sentence of the "baobab" example needs to be rewritten; the word "capacious" comes across as straining to find a fancy term for a simple concept.

caw
 

LOG

Lagrangian
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
7,714
Reaction score
354
Location
Between there and there
I doubt most people would recognize the term, so even if it's narrative you should probably use something more common, or maybe poetic.
 

Sophia

Self-Ban
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
4,925
Reaction score
2,410
Location
U.K.
Would it be awkward to say that a certain tree is "capacious" because it holds a lot of water? It seems like capacious is usually applied to large enclosures or wide open spaces, but I am trying to emphasize the amount of empty space within the tree.

"While the Baobab tree appears solid, it is in fact extremely capacious. Within its trunk alone it stores up to 25,000 gallons of water".

I think the word capacious is fine to use, but it perhaps isn't the best word to use in the context you have. I would expect "While the baobab tree appears solid, it is in fact ..." to be followed by something that is the opposite of what we are led to expect from the first part of that sentence. "Capacious" doesn't quite fit that, as something that appears solid can still have a large capacity (e.g sugar cane, or a sheet of absorbent kitchen paper).
 

Brad

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
83
Reaction score
6
Well, a solid object, by definition, can't be capacious.

I was looking for a vocabulary word to fit to this little paragraph, but I guess capacious probably shouldn't be the one.
 

Deleted member 42

It's imprecise. You need to discover what's special about the trunk (the trunk is made of thousands of dense fibers which absorb water). Capacious implies things like roomy, and spacious--and hollow. The Baobab is not hollow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Arkie

a reader's ear and a writer's heart
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
688
Reaction score
82
Location
Arkansas
Nabokov used capacious in "Speak, Memory," to describe his mother's handbag.
 

Deleted member 42

Nabokov used capacious in "Speak, Memory," to describe his mother's handbag.

Exactly; keep in mind capacious is cognate with capacitiy. It implies a hollow space, something to be filled. The baobob tree is filled with thick dense closely packed fibrous strands that absorb and retain water.
 

djf881

AW Addict
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
705
Reaction score
144
Location
New York
Would it be awkward to say that a certain tree is "capacious" because it holds a lot of water? It seems like capacious is usually applied to large enclosures or wide open spaces, but I am trying to emphasize the amount of empty space within the tree.

"While the Baobab tree appears solid, it is in fact extremely capacious. Within its trunk alone it stores up to 25,000 gallons of water".

Is it hollow? Or is the water stored in the cells? A vessel can be capacious. Also, in context, it sounds like "capacious" is an antonym of "solid," which it is not.