I was playing around on Google today and found this:
http://www.thebookseller.com/news/french-and-watson-lead-strong-first-half-debuts.html
This is a list of the top 10 bestselling hardbacks so far this year. Is 7,000 copies for a hardback good, or will this maybe make publishers more wary of historical novels set in the Roman period?
It could be me, I'm not well acquainted with hardback sales [this book was on sale for £7.99 as a hardback and a 99p ebook.] The publisher is Corvus, and I'm starting to think that there might be a fatigue with Roman set novels. Or should I just get the book written, and remind myself my book is different to the current crop of Roman set novels?
http://www.thebookseller.com/news/french-and-watson-lead-strong-first-half-debuts.html
Before I Go to Sleep S J Watson Doubleday 22,728
New Beginnings Fern Britton HarperCollins 20,571
A Discovery of Witches Deborah Harkness Headline 17,591
When God Was a Rabbit Sarah Winman Headline 12,377
Sanctus Simon Toyne HarperCollins 12,273
The Hypnotist Lars Kepler Blue Door 11,767
A Tiny Bit Marvellous Dawn French Michael Joseph 10,142
The Tiger's Wife Téa Obreht Weidenfeld 9,008
Vespasian Robert Fabbri Corvus 7,024
Snowdrops A J Miller Atlantic 5,663
This is a list of the top 10 bestselling hardbacks so far this year. Is 7,000 copies for a hardback good, or will this maybe make publishers more wary of historical novels set in the Roman period?
It could be me, I'm not well acquainted with hardback sales [this book was on sale for £7.99 as a hardback and a 99p ebook.] The publisher is Corvus, and I'm starting to think that there might be a fatigue with Roman set novels. Or should I just get the book written, and remind myself my book is different to the current crop of Roman set novels?
