|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Interview
with Earl Merkel Interview by Jenna Glatzer Earl
Merkel is a novelist and writer who spent more than a decade as a practicing
“There
is nothing in Final Epidemic that could not happen,” Merkel
says. “The threat is real— and according to many experts in bioterrorism,
inevitable. Last year’s anthrax attack only underscores our vulnerability;
anthrax is not contagious— but many Mr.
Merkel is also the author of Like Distant Cities Burning, a novel of How
did you get your start as a writer? The blame for that probably goes to my parents, who got me hooked on
reading even before I reported to kindergarten; to my second-grade teacher--
hello, out there, Mrs. Sauget!-- who coaxed me into my first, three-sentence
literary effort; and to Sister Demetrius, my sixth-grade teacher who could have
given tips to a Marine drill instructor on structure and discipline... and not
only as they relate to writing a cogent, well-researched essay. <Grin>
I probably should also credit the girl I dated as a junior in high school. She
signed us both up for the yearbook class, then dumped me over the summer. So I
changed to the only class that was still available: journalism. I spent the next
dozen or so years working as a reporter, columnist, freelancer, corporate flak
and self-employed communications consultant. So
I suppose it was Susan who started me down the dark path of daily
writing-for-pay. And that brought me to the sorry state you see today. Let me re-phrase the question: how did you become a novelist? I have only myself to
blame for that. About four or so years ago, I had a rather large corporate
client which was taken over by another company. Suddenly, I had a window of
opportunity; translated, that means there was no new client on the horizon. So I
took the chance to do what I’d always said I wanted to try: writing a novel
and getting it published. I gave myself six months to do it; of course, it took
two years. Fortunately, by then I had finished a second book, and Penguin/Putnam
bought both in a two-book deal. Which came first: the agent or the publisher? Did you get many rejections? Well, first came my
first agent, from a rather prestigious agency in Washington, D.C.
Turned out that he had a good record at placing nonfiction, but had
never sold a novel before. He took
my first book to market and couldn’t get any house to bid on it. That book was
rejected by every major publishing house in the country, and most of the minor
ones; heck, at a certain point in the daily rejection process, I wouldn’t have
been surprised to hear that even Kinko’s had passed on photocopying the
manuscript. My
then-agent was so depressed that he quit the agent business to become a dot.com
entrepreneur; unfortunately, he didn’t tell me or his other writing clients. I
didn’t know that I was suddenly un-agented until I called to say I had
finished the novel that came to be titled FINAL EPIDEMIC. Even then, it took a
half-dozen e-mails and several phone calls; finally, a kind-hearted receptionist
there let me in on the secret: Elvis had left the auditorium. Turned
out to be a blessing in disguise, since my subsequent search led me to
super-lady and superagent Kimberley Cameron (Reese Halsey Agency North). She
read my stuff, called me within a couple of days and signed me up.
A few months later, we had a deal with a Penguin/Putnam imprint. I understand your debut book, FINAL EPIDEMIC, made it to the bestseller
list in its second week of publication. Surprised all of us, I think. I got a call from Kimberley, who
had heard from my editor, Laura Ann Gilman at Penguin/Putnam, and my jaw fell
open. FINAL EPIDEMIC came in at No. 33 of the Barnes & Noble list in its
first week, right behind Stephen King’s BLACK HOUSE.
<Grin> I don’t think Mr. King is too worried.
Still, we’re in the twenties now, I hear. I try not to look, ‘cause I
don’t want to jinx anything.
Yet FINAL EPIDEMIC was postponed because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Why was the book postponed for so long, and do you think it was the right
decision? I used to think the
delay was purely a marketing decision-- but that might have been the starving
artist talking. FINAL EPIDEMIC had
cleared final edits in late August, 2001, and we expected publication within a
few months. Then came September 11, 2001, followed closely by the anthrax/mail
attacks. I had a finished book-- and here, the words in my thought balloon would
always go into boldface, capital letters-- ON THE HOTTEST SUBJECT IN THE WORLD.
And it couldn’t get to market, because it was deemed that the public was too
traumatized to accept such a book. I
don’t know if that assessment was accurate; frankly, I think it was an
underestimation of the strength and resiliency of the reading audience, both in
general and for New Yorkers in particular.
On the other hand, I know how angry the terrorist attacks left me, so
perhaps it’s best that publication was delayed. I guess it’s a moot point
now; I’m just glad FINAL EPIDEMIC is finally out, and getting a nice
reception. You did a lot of research for that book. Tell me about how you contacted experts in terrorism and
biological warfare. Were they all
willing to talk to you? Probably the most valuable
tool for research ever created is the Internet. With it, you can access
virtually the entire wealth of knowledge available.
That’s how I started: then I’d contact the people who wrote the
articles, or who were mentioned in them. It got easier as I went along, because
one source would refer me to another, or give me an introduction, or smooth the
way with an e-mail or a phone call. But
it helped considerably that I was writing a novel, and that I promised to keep
all sources confidential. Frankly, I don’t know how a guy like Richard Preston
does the masterful job he does; he writes nonfiction, attributes comments and
quotes, and somehow overcomes what must be a massive amount of resistance and
stone-walling. He, and the others who write nonfiction on such sensitive
subjects, fill me with admiration. How much of your novels are based on real life? Almost all of it.
I think that’s true of most writers in the suspense/mystery/thriller categories.
You see, all of us are actually engaged in telling a lie: we’re telling a story
that didn’t happen, populating it with people who exist only in our
imaginations, and trying to get the reader to accept all of it as true.
One
of the ways we do that comes right out of Thomas Aquinas: he said that any lie
is effective in direct proportion to the amount of truth that it contains.
As a writer, I try to use the realities of life --the “truths” we all
recognize, and would all agree to be “real life” --to entice the reader into
the fictional world and events of my story.
<Laughs.> How awful that sounds!
It reduces truth and reality merely to writing tactics, doesn’t it? You’ve said that you tend to work on two books simultaneously.
Why so? Well, I do start two
books at about the same time, but somewhere in the process, I’ve always ended
up locking into one that I then carry through to completion. You
see, for me, the most difficult task is getting my story started-- because my
books aren’t outlined or blocked out in advance. Instead, I depend on
developing characters whom I know so well that I can drop them into any given
situation and let them act in the only way their kind of personality can act.
I
like this system, because if I can’t predict what is going to happen, the odds
are good my readers will be just as surprised. But it also means that I count on
my characters to “go rogue” on me and take off in unexpected directions.
By working on two books simultaneously, it seems to help avoid stalling
out and going blank while I’m waiting for that to happen. Thus
far, I’ve been lucky with my two-book practice; inevitably, the characters in
one or the other will catch fire, and I take off in pursuit. Before I realize
it, I’ve discovered which of the books I know I have to write and finish. You've also been a journalist and corporate writer.
How did you find the time to write novels while you were doing all of
this other writing? Did you ever worry about "burning out"? The simple answer is
that I didn’t write any novels during that period.
Oops-- let me correct that: I didn’t FINISH any. I
think that most people who want to write have a manuscript in the back of a
drawer somewhere-- usually, two or three chapters they’ve done in their
“spare” time. And, truth be told, they’re probably a couple of the best
darned chapters anybody has ever read-- You
see, that was my problem: with the press of my daily life, I’d wait until I
felt “creative” to do some writing. You can imagine how frequently the
average person feels creative, so I didn’t get much done that way. So instead,
I’d pull out what I had already written-- and polish a word here, change a
phrase there. It was so much easier
to edit, to rework what I had already written, than it was to try to write
something new. I
had to make the conscious decision to write chapter three, then chapter four,
etcetera-- and to write something new every day. I set a daily minimum of five
pages; new pages, not merely tweaking what I’d written the day before.
I had to advance the story each day, five pages per day, five days per
week. I
still stick to that schedule; I have to. A lot of days I may end up only keeping
two or three pages of what I had written; but I always write my daily five.
Do the math: even at worst-case scenario, at the end of a few months you
have a finished first draft of a book. As
for burning out... <grin> well, it’s too early in my career for me to
know much about that. My favorite line is still that book-writing is more fun
than working for a living. What advice would you offer new novelists? Persevere. Don’t
surrender. Feed on the rejection and use it to fuel your renewed energy. Read--
a helluva lot-- and learn from what you read. In what you read, identify the
various tactics and styles and writing rhythms that the author has incorporated
into the work; don’t be afraid to try them, to improve on them if you can, in
your own work. And
write, write, write. It’s how we learn our craft, at every stage of our
careers. Anything else you'd like to add? Only that every writer
needs to study the book industry as if his or her life depends on it.
Because it does. Far
too many of us don’t really understand this crazy business we’ve chosen to
join. We don’t understand the economics of the trade, the nuances of marketing
the books in today’s bookselling environment, the do-it-yourself promotional
efforts we need to make AFTER the book has been written. As
a first-time novelist, I’m making mistakes like crazy. <Grin.> But my
second novel --LIKE DISTANT CITIES BURNING-- is due out from Penguin/Putnam in
the spring, and I’d like to think that all the mistakes I make when it comes
to market will be new ones. CLICK HERE TO ORDER FINAL EPIDEMIC. Visit Earl's websites: Earl
Merkel: A Writer's Homepage, Continued Earl
Merkel is available for media interviews. To schedule an interview, either in
person or by phone, contact Jarett Quinana at Signete Publicity/Penguin Putnam
Inc., 375 Hudson St., 5th Fl. New York, NY 10014 (jquintana@penguinputnam.com),
or call Mr. Merkel direct at 312/246-1812. Mr.
Merkel is represented by Kimberley Cameron of the Reece Halsey
|
Sponsored links
Make a Real Living as a Freelance Writer! How to find a book publisher |
|
Text on this site Copyright © 1998-2007
Absolute Write, all rights reserved.
|