Absolute Write - Back to home

Subscribe to the Absolute Write Newsletter and get

 the Agents! Agents! Agents! report free! Click here.

 

 Win a 1-year subscription to Writer's Digest by subscribing to Absolute Markets-- all paying markets for your writing. Click here.

 

Group Scenes
B
y Leon Kaye

I have read more than thirty scripts from aspiring screenwriters, and have noticed that many are in a mad-rush to get through a group scene.  Given the countless articles on brevity in screenwriting, I can see why writers are afraid to devote more than three sentences to description.  The screenwriting gurus tell us, "Don't over-describe."  "Let the art director choose what belongs in a scene."  "Screenwriting is action." "Screenplays are not novels."  "We need to see lots of white space on the page."  Blah, blah, blah. 

Now, I'm for brevity as much as the next guy, but not at the expense of losing a feel for what's going on.  Yes, it's a tight rope we all need to walk.  When is description too much description?  When do we need to see a smile, a glare?  When does the dialogue say it all?  Do we need to know what the living room looks like?  What every person in the group is doing?  How they are reacting? 

Reason tells us we do not need to know the color of a character's tie, but we may need to know if he's wearing a suit, or a pull-over, or pajamas.  We need to SEE the characters as well as the setting.  What types of characters are there?   Are there buildings?   What type?  Is it raining?  Is it winter?  In short, readers need to see the scene in their heads, or else-- there's no drama, no good writing, no six-figure sale! 

SETTING

A group scene will not be as effective if the reader has no visual image of the scene's location, or WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING.   If there is a street demonstration, what do the individual demonstrators look like, what are they yelling?   Are they holding signs?  What do they say?  Are there policemen nearby?  Is there dissension among the ranks?  Though it's cold outside, is there a mother holding a newborn, risking its health?   In other words, SHOW US WHY the scene is important.

There are also specific sounds inherent to different locales (car horns, gossip, loudspeakers, cheering, etc.)Can any of these sounds add vitality to an otherwise ordinary scene?

NON-LEAD CHARACTERS

Scenes such as the above demonstration often involve groups of "non-lead" characters.  When their group drama is broken down into a series of individual dramas, the plight of the each character becomes more personal, more engaging.  For instance, in a film such as "Schindler's List", there is a scene in which the Jews race after the trucks carrying their children away.  The focus of the action moves from the group to the individual woman, a young mother.  A look of profound horror on her, she screams, grabs at the children's hands as they wave goodbye, and the truck speeds away.  She is no longer one person in a sea of faces.  She is an individual, and her horror becomes ours.

Can you think of any way to "individualize" a group scene with non-lead characters?

"Titanic" also handles its masses well, intercutting the actions of the lead characters to those of non-leads.  Often the non-lead is an example of what not to do, or where not to go.  But always, the non-leads are portrayed as humans that want the same things as the leads.  A brief description of their appearance may instill in them some humanity that otherwise would be lost.

Can you briefly give the reader a visual image of a non-lead character?

INTERPLAY

Often, lead characters are in the midst of a large group.  They may be at a ball game, or on the subway, or a million other places.  And though the action may exist only between these lead characters, it is important not to forget a group is also present.  Keep in mind what the members of the group are doing at all times.  Should they come into contact with the lead characters?  If there is a party, are there too many guests for the room's size?  Is there dancing?   Pushing and shoving?   Would it make sense for the lead character (that wants to talk to his attractive co-star) to "take her arm, gently pull her away from a particularly nosy old woman"?  Could this interplay with a supporting character add something to the scene?   Or maybe he can walk by the barbecue, where the host hands him a tray of hot dogs.  The lead then tries to compliment his beautiful co-star as party-guests approach, and grab at the hot dogs.

Would interplay with non-leads add anything to your scene?

LEAD CHARACTER'S MOTIVES

When groups of lead characters come together, sometimes it's easy to overlook the fact that each character has MOTIVES.  And when you're talking about writing a group scene, problems arise exponentially.  It's very difficult to keep many characters and their motives straight in your mind.  The task of "spinning the plates" while writing a good group scene can be a daunting one. I find it very useful to place myself in the shoes of EVERY character in a given scene.  Would someone speak up?  Keep quiet?  Interrupt an admission?  Get angry?  Perceive another character's guilt?  If I were the character, what would I do?

Characters should be permitted to say what they naturally would say, do what they must do-- even if it's messy-- even if two characters speak simultaneously, cut each other off, or walk away.

Visualize your scene.  Are all the lead characters actively pursuing their goals?

GROUP ACTION

Motive leads to action, and sometimes the simultaneous actions of different group members can be hard to orchestrate.  That is why it is imperative to know where each character is at all times.  Sometimes the task is not that difficult, when characters are in very static locations (e.g., sitting in a car, at a round poker table, standing in an elevator).  But sometimes characters are ubiquitous, fighting, dancing, or running in and out of the room.  In these cases, it may be advantageous for a writer to draw a picture of the scene, or play-act a fight with friends.   Believe me, you will surprise yourself with the absurd actions you have written in some of your scenes.

And while there are some actions one has planned before writing a script, other actions could arise from a better knowledge of location and props.  It's one thing to write at a computer, it's another to visit a location, see what items are readily available to a visitor.  If an angry bride needs to throw something at the groom, she has her bouquet, she can grab the Reverend's book of sermons, or she can grab an incense censor, and swing it hard into the groom's kneecap.  (I'm certain Jackie Chan doesn't write his fight scenes on a computer). 

REACTION

Sometimes a group scene is interesting because of its character's REACTIONS.  Races, athletic contests, shoot-outs, unveilings, etc. rely on the action of the lead character and the reactions of others.  Through these reactions, we learn how each character feels about the hero.  For example, the hero wins the race.  His parents smile proudly.  His competitor stomps angrily.  The townspeople cheer, his ex-girlfriend weeps.  His friends high-five each other. 

*

I guess it's one thing creating an outline for a screenplay and punching out a story.  It's quite another imagining your screenplay as a three-dimensional film, chock full of possibilities.  On a page, if a character stays silent, we follow the printed dialogue and pass by the omission.  On screen, we see the character standing idly by.  And the scene becomes unbelievable.  On the page, a fight scene may make logistical sense, but may seem totally fake when we actually see it.  Or, we may see the hero pass by a discarded weapon when battling the dragon, because the screenwriter forgot it was dropped there. 

It all comes down to visualization.  Visualizing the settings, your characters, their actions, and conveying enough detail to your readers, thus enabling them to "see" the drama in their minds is a crucial part of screenwriting.  I have read scripts where the police drag a lead character to the gallows for execution.  Meanwhile, "people stand" or "policemen watch," or "demonstrators yell."  No more description than that. I have read scripts that display a slug line, then forge right into the action, leaving me no clue as to what the scene is like.

It could be that these writers were unimaginative or they were faithful followers of the brevity gurus.  My two cents-- if you need five sentences to adequately describe a scene and its characters, use five.  So maybe your script will be two pages longer.  I think it's worth it.  If you'd like to use a line to describe a non-lead character, do it.  I applaud you.  If the drama you have created engages your readers, I'm sure they will not mind.

LEON KAYE has one full-length published stageplay and a few published shorts. His agent is ELAINE DEVLIN (NY).  He has placed in a few script and stageplay contests, and has received public readings.

 

 

Google
 

Web
Absolute Classes
Absolute Write

Sponsored links

Ring binders

 

 

 

Make a Real Living as a Freelance Writer!

How to find a book publisher

 

Home

Text on this site Copyright © 1998-2007 Absolute Write, all rights reserved.
Please contact the authors if you'd like to reprint articles on this site.  All copyrights are retained by original authors.  And plagiarizers will be rounded up, handcuffed, and stuck into a very small and humid room wherein they must listen to Barney sing the "I Love You, You Love Me" song over and over again.

writers writing software