|
| |||||||||||||
|
| Interview with
Spencer Beglarian By Mary J. Schirmer
He's
produced documentaries, short films, educational videos, and a 13-episode,
half-hour weekly TV series that aired on an ABC affiliate. A
member of SAG, AFTRA, and Actors' Equity, he's starred in films, including the
short festival film, JUST DON'T DO IT, which he wrote.
He's had roles on SABRINA, THE TEENAGE WITCH, THE DIVISION, CYBILL, and
CHEERS among other prime-time shows. His
extensive theater experience includes Broadway, off-Broadway, and Yale Repertory
Theatre plays. Beglarian
teaches at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising in Los Angeles.
His Web site is www.spencerbeglarian.com. He
took time from his busy schedule for an email interview. How
does being an actor affect your screenwriting and visual storytelling? I
think my education and experience as an actor have been great assets for
screenwriting in many ways. At both
USC and Yale Drama School, we were trained as actors to analyze and break down
texts. When I work as an actor, I
always strive to fulfill the function of my role and the individual scene as it
informs the entire story and flow of the action. Psychology, needs, and subtext are crucial elements of
character that we explored in the text along with action and how it relates to
each character’s arc and journey through the story. This
critical insight and objectivity are great tools when I write as well.
Also, because all actors thrive on playing complex characters with rich
needs and distinct traits, I try to write characters that are multi-layered,
textured, and unique – roles that actors will want to play.
Dialogue, behavior, physicality, back story, props, settings and
locations all become quite specific when I write because I always envision
acting the role, so I can imagine and realize what is truthful, real, physically
and psychologically dynamic. My
imagination has been trained to visualize every action, beat, objective and
specific detail. Ironically,
writing is often more thrilling than acting because, as a writer, I get to play
all the roles! Once we get to
rehearsal and production, however, I take direction as both an actor and a
writer. Ultimately, film is a
director’s medium, so I feel my job, as either writer or actor, is to trust
and integrate the vision of the director. Since
film is an international commodity, what genres do you think travel best? I
suppose stories that are truthful, universal and profound find an international
audience. Great characters are
appealing to all audiences. I
believe the best films possess essential elements that transcend the boundaries
of language, culture, time and place. These
films might be from any genre. How
important is networking in your work? Networking
is crucial to success in any field, but it is only a third of my focus.
My energy and goals are focused into three categories: creation, profit,
and promotion. Creation might be
when I write something on spec, experience other art forms, research topics or
new trends. Profit is defined by
the jobs that pay which may or may not satisfy my creativity.
Finally, I focus on promotion or “putting myself out there,” e.g.
submitting, marketing, networking, meeting and searching for more work. Ideally, a project I’m working on might allow me to benefit
in all three of these areas, but that’s not always the case. I
try to explore creative ways to network through film festivals, the Internet,
writing groups, markets, workshops, even alumni associations.
I think the key to effective networking is to research those individuals
I meet and discover how both of us might benefit from our connection. Does
being a screenwriter give you more respect for written material, i.e., does it
make you less willing to deviate from the script when you act or direct? As
an actor, I have always felt it is my absolute duty, honor, and privilege to
respect the written material. Everything
I create as an actor comes from the text. However,
film is considered a director’s medium. Consequently,
as a writer, I’ve always enjoyed integrating feedback from directors,
producers and actors. It makes me a
better writer. Film thrives on
collaboration, so I have learned that as a screenwriter or actor it is my
responsibility to absorb, adapt, and satisfy any creative input. As
a director, I feel I must respect and work with the screenwriter until we are
collectively satisfied with the script before it can be filmed.
I’m currently developing a feature I will direct but haven’t written.
I chose the script because I love the characters and the message. My notes and feedback to the writer only concern increasing
the visual elements and behavior of the characters – how the story is told
rather than what the story is saying, and our work together has been hugely
rewarding for both of us – a true collaboration in the very best sense.
I suspect it is because I’ve been in his shoes.
As a director, I am committed to shepherding his script, respecting his
talent and sharing his story with the broadest audience possible.
I
believe there are four phases of a screenplay’s transformation into a film:
the page, translating the page into footage, editing the footage into a film,
and re-cutting after feedback from the producer, investors and/or audience. Will
computer generated images make actors obsolete? I doubt actors will ever become obsolete. Nicholson’s grin, Streep’s metamorphoses, Hanks’ impulsive humor and vulnerability, and Monroe’s physicality and vocal modulations prove that such unique creations and humanity can’t be copied or programmed. Still, I wholly embrace and look forward to the wondrous innovations that technology affords. I am forever amazed by the progress of filmmaking. What
are three common mistakes that new screenwriters make? I
think we can underestimate the sophistication of today’s audiences, spoon-feed
the set-up, and plant exposition in ordinary ways. How much information I release, the timing, and the way in
which I reveal it are major creative challenges I face whenever I am writing a
script. I would strongly suggest
that new screenwriters tap into their own personal experience and imagination,
strive to develop the emotional lives of their characters, and care deeply about
what their story has to say or offer to the audience. Most important, don’t ever give up! You
write in short and long form. Which
do you prefer, and why? I’m
inspired by both forms. A great
60-second commercial, innovative music video or seductive trailer is really
carrying on the tradition of the short film as an art form in our culture.
Currently, the U.S. film industry doesn’t really recognize the short
film as a viable commodity. This is
unfortunate because, with shorts, I can offer a slice of life, explore an issue,
or tell a simple story with a strong reversal and no excess – like a great
short story. The audience can laugh, be moved, transported or surprised
immediately, but I’m challenged to utilize every frame for the greatest
advantage and impact. With
features, I need to orchestrate a journey with multiple characters, development,
structure, motif and resolution, much like a novel.
I have the luxury of time and a captive audience with a feature, but the
responsibility is greater in a sense. I
have to keep my audience involved for the duration, modulate the experience I
create for them, and ultimately offer something that is, hopefully, worth their
time. Please
explain to our readers your decision to become a hyphenate - a
writer/director/producer/actor. Why
did you enter all of those creative arenas? My
father was a composer, and he played a range of musical instruments in order to
experience the distinct characteristics of each (e.g. strings, brass, woodwind,
and percussion). As a result, he
could appreciate what each player contributes to a composition.
I feel the greater my range of experience, the more respect and
sensitivity I’ll have for the variety of disciplines that make up film
production. By
understanding the process and input of each member on the production team, I
hope to inspire, integrate, and utilize the best from everyone.
I want to know how best to foster and support the entire creative process
of making a film. On the other hand, when I am contributing to someone else’s
project or functioning in only one capacity, I know how to adjust, support and
facilitate as a team member. From a
logistical standpoint, lower-budget films seem to be often written and directed
by the same person. I suppose
hyphenates can simplify the process of making movies and offer a purity of
vision which will remain from script to screen. Do
you prefer writing for TV, film, or stage, and why? I
love writing, regardless of the medium! I
find writing for an existing TV series has the most specific objectives and
parameters. My intentions are very
clear when I write in that medium. The
characters, relationships and situations have already been created.
Producers know what they want, and the audience response is almost
immediate – your work will be broadcast within days or weeks. When
I write for TV, deadlines can inspire my very best work.
TV can be very rewarding and challenging because it tests my innovation
and ability to work under pressure. If
I am writing a TV pilot, I need to create a story that is unfinished.
I have the luxury of developing characters and a story that will play out
over time. My job is to reinvent
these elements and innovate. With
film, I have more freedom, but greater responsibility.
Film offers less of a blueprint, and I must create the arena, characters
and story as a complete experience. The
action, visual storytelling and characters must be clear and realized for the
very first time. I know with a film
there is a certain alchemy that will happen with the director in development, on
the set, in post and editing, so the process is less formulaic. When
writing for stage, language becomes a primary focus for me because the audience
can’t always see the intimate actions and details of your characters.
The physical limitations of a stage often dictate the location and
breadth of the story. Right now,
I’m exploring writing a stage musical which has the potential to be a film or
TV production as well. This concept
of adapting material written for one medium to others is quite exciting and
inspiring to me. The same story and
experience can be shared in a variety of ways, e.g., CHICAGO, THE FULL MONTY,
HAIRSPRAY, THE LION KING. In
persuading actors to become the characters the screenwriter envisioned, are the
clues in the description or dialogue? Would
you please give an example? I
think actors find clues in dialogue, action and description.
I can communicate so many things with a specific description, what a
character is wearing, some well-chosen adjectives, the vocabulary or cadence
used in dialogue. Below
is a rather extreme example of how being specific as I write can create and
communicate a much more vivid characterization. SHEILA
GOLDFARB, an assistant bank manager, sips her coffee and grimaces. SHEILA --- SHEILA GOLDFARB, an assistant bank manager, wears a suit that’s three sizes too small and reveals too much. She struts to the coffee pot, pours an inch into a cup. She has big hair, dark roots and caked make up. She smells it and takes a sip. Her face and voice explode. SHEILA Is
a script's potential to make money - pure and simple - the attraction for any
producer? I
wish a producer could predict a script’s potential to make money!
I’m sure some producers focus only on profit, but I believe many have
various hopes for a script. The
potential for critical recognition, winning awards, a hit soundtrack, subject
matter, the talent involved, or an unusual story could also attract a producer.
Again, these elements might bolster its profit potential, but no script
is ever a sure bet. I
think many producers want to make quality films that reflect their taste, foster
new, creative talent, tell stories that matter and make a difference in
people’s lives. I could be overly
optimistic, but I do believe that generosity, wisdom and the satisfaction that
they might contribute to the power, humanity, quality and legacy of film might
be of equal or greater value to box office for some producers. It's
such a struggle/challenge for new screenwriters to break into the business.
Do you have any advice about self-promotion? As
an actor, I always knew I had to put it out there on a consistent basis to get
some return. Invest in yourself.
Move beyond your comfort zone. Meet
people. Tell them about your work..
When you win a contest, have a new script, or career update, remind them.
Follow up on all your leads and contacts.
Use the Internet for research and communication.
Write for a specific audience, producer or market and then pursue that
target. Market
yourself as you would a product or service.
Start out by submitting a query a day for a month, rather than thirty
queries in one day. Be realistic
about your goals and what you hope to accomplish, but be creative and begin with
small steps. Ask some actors, whose
work you like, to do a reading of your script.
Invite an audience when everyone feels it’s ready for one.
Don’t be afraid to explore the potential of making your own short film
or feature. I’ve
learned that people who say no or reject you will often say yes as soon as
someone else does. Remember that
everyone has a different opinion, but not everyone can be right.
Be generous with your talent. Do
some things for free or on spec. You
can charge them the next time. Build
a body of work and a reputation that reflects what is unique about what you have
to offer. Try to maintain a sense of humor and enjoy yourself.
Use a calm tenacity and cheerful persistence as you pursue your dreams. *** Thanks
for your time and insights.
To read past Film Fuss columns, click the buttons in the left navigation bar. |
Sponsored links
Make a Real Living as a Freelance Writer! How to find a book publisher |
|
Text on this site Copyright © 1998-2007
Absolute Write, all rights reserved.
|