Thanks for replying, Grift.
One of the reasons I asked, was that I've been studying his character and I've discovered a certain disparity between the Javert we're shown and the Javert we're described.
For instance: when introducing the character for the first time, Hugo describes him as an unbending fanatic with a rigid outlook on life and a grim, simple philosophy.
This kind of man, the kind that Hugo unerringly describes (except in book four, chapter 10) would be expected to act officially (if not officiously) all the time. Why, then, does Javert almost
never act in accordance to the way he is described? His manner of speech is very informal, and riddled with spates of muttering to himself about inconsequential things or bursts of sharp humour. He seems to have some kind of death wish most of the time and definitely is extraordinarily clever.
We - or rather 'I' - am left with the feeling that Javert is either Schizophrenic or Hugo was a tad confused. Did he indulge his admittedly fantastic strength in characterization while Javert was merely wandering around investigating things, and then over-emphasise the man's robot side when it had some bearing on the novel's moral point?
Also, just a little quibble with your comment about him relentlessly pursuing a man like Valjean: I'm afraid I can't agree with you there. It is plain from the book that he did not pursue Valjean for 20-odd years as is so popularly believed.
Book-wise, he met up with Valjean in the following ways.
In Toulon, where Valjean was a sullen, surly, angry chap who escaped five times and probably made the guards lives hell. Who knows what happened to the men who went out and tried to re-arrest Valjean 'Le Crick'?
In M-sur-M. Coincidence. Javert recognises something about Valjean and begins to investigate. We, the readers, know that Valjean is a good guy now. However, as far as Javert knows, he's a man who robs priests and little children.
In the Gorbeau Tenements (take1) Coincidence again. Javert was not really expecting to see Valjean here. Also, note that Valjean, when taken to court, was accused of being a member of a group of robbers in the hills. He didn't deny it. These robbers would burn the families until they were told where the valuables were. Not nice people. So, can you blame Javert for wanting to put this fellow back behind bars?
Gorbeau Tenements (take 2) Now, Hugo is just getting carried away. Javert has been pottering on quite happily thank you for the past eight or so years. He just wants to catch Patron Minette! And Valjean is there? Coincidence or plot device?
The Barricade: Heck, Javert wasn't even after Valjean here.
The Sewers: Same again. Javert was following Thernadier.
So, as can be seen from the timeline of the book, Javert was the victim of circumstances beyond his control (namely, his author hated him
). He had no reason to believe that Valjean had become a 'nice guy'. His duty (yes, I used that mantra-word of his) required him to capture a dangerous escapee.
What do you think? I agree that Javert was a harsh man in many ways, but don't you think that perhaps popular culture has over-villified him a little?
I'd be really glad to hear your opinions. Thanks again for replying (oh, and sorry if this post got a little long and rambly
)