- Joined
- Feb 13, 2005
- Messages
- 3,126
- Reaction score
- 768
- Location
- Near Cincinnati
- Website
- www.allensedge.com
I was recommended this title by a fellow AW member. It sounded intriguing: a book within a book about a film, kind of a literary version of Blair Witch Project.
I had to read it.
On the outset, the book is very interesting. A guy named Johnny Truant learns from his friend Lude that an old man living in Lude's apartment building died recently of mysterious circumstances. They go check out the old man's apartment. It's very weird in there. Johnny finds a trunk containing manuscript pages and other odds and ends relating to a book called The Navidson Record. The Navidson Record is a scholarly nonfiction treatise about the experiences of filmmaker/photographer Will Navidson and family when he owned a unique house filled with mysterious hallways.
Johnny pieces the manuscript together, and as he does this, he adds his own footnotes that detail what he's going through in his own life as he reads TNR. Eventually, Johnny's life starts falling apart as he further delves into TNR. How is his life becoming meshed with TNR exactly? The reader never really finds out. In the end, Johnny goes on a quest to find the house "on Ash Tree Lane" in Virginia, but never finds it.
My take on this book.
First, TNR. I've written three nonfiction books, and none were as "scholarly" and annotated as TNR. EVERYTHING has a footnote, some extremely long and usually unnecessary. The old man who wrote it, "Zampano," writes in incredible vivid detail of the house and its explorations and how it affected everyone involved in it. At times I found it interesting, and other times it was relentlessly boring. There were numerous "stylistic" choices made, such as a single word on a page (usually relating to explorations), upside down writing, reversed writing, all for reasons relating to the current theme. I had no idea if Johnny was supposed have created the manuscript this way, or if it were Zampano's choices.
Overall, TNR itself was interesting "nonfiction" but didn't draw any conclusions on whatever became of the house and where the mysterious hallways came from, even though Zampano interjected a lot of his own opinions throughout. I found it fascinating, though, just how much press and analysis Navidson's house gained after his movie was released.
Johnny's story. Johnny is shown slowly losing his mind as he continues piecing together TNR. This is done in gigantically long footnotes that were at times compelling, and other times confusing and, well, boring. The writing itself was solid and, even though both TNR and Johnny's story were in effect written by Danielewski, the two voices were distinct.
What I didn't understand, though, was why those things were happening to Johnny. Why was he hallucinating? Why was he screaming out in his sleep? All he was doing was compiling TNR. Why would he think that whatever happened in the house in TNR was also happening to him? The author never shows us.
Even worse, is that there is no end in Johnny's story. He goes off to find the house, doesn't find it, and then . . . that's kind of it. Even more confusing is when he visits a bar and hears the band playing a song inspired by TNR. He talks to the band and discovers they have a manuscript "downloaded off the internet" that they had voraciously read and marked up. The story in TNR inspired one of their songs (The Five and a Half Minute Hallway). Johnny is surprised, but doesn't reveal that he is the Johnny in the footnotes in the story.
When had House of Leaves/TNR been made available to the reading public? Johnny almost burned the manuscript once, but he never said that he published it online. Never. That one really threw me, even though Johnny himself didn't question it, like wait a minute, that manuscript is still in the trunk of my car.
Then there's all the supposed "secret codes" the reader is apparently supposed to decode (which I ranted about in another thread). After going through this thing, I had no desire to search for the sentences to decode.
By the time I got to the end, with the pages and pages of letters from Johnny's mother, I had lost interest. At this point I had a signed copy of Will Lavender's Obedience waiting for me to read, and every one of Johnny's mother's letters were redundant and didn't add any sort of conclusion to House of Leaves or Johnny himself.
All in all, House of Leaves is a unique approach to novel writing and story telling. I wish I had thought of the idea first, though. My approach, would have been different. I suppose HOL is "modernist fiction" but it really didn't thrill me as the awesome piece of literature so many people make it out to be.
I would love to know Danielewski's background, though: his inspiration for writing it, his background in writing nonfiction, and especially how he found a publisher for it. How do you write a query letter for something like this?
allen
I had to read it.
On the outset, the book is very interesting. A guy named Johnny Truant learns from his friend Lude that an old man living in Lude's apartment building died recently of mysterious circumstances. They go check out the old man's apartment. It's very weird in there. Johnny finds a trunk containing manuscript pages and other odds and ends relating to a book called The Navidson Record. The Navidson Record is a scholarly nonfiction treatise about the experiences of filmmaker/photographer Will Navidson and family when he owned a unique house filled with mysterious hallways.
Johnny pieces the manuscript together, and as he does this, he adds his own footnotes that detail what he's going through in his own life as he reads TNR. Eventually, Johnny's life starts falling apart as he further delves into TNR. How is his life becoming meshed with TNR exactly? The reader never really finds out. In the end, Johnny goes on a quest to find the house "on Ash Tree Lane" in Virginia, but never finds it.
My take on this book.
First, TNR. I've written three nonfiction books, and none were as "scholarly" and annotated as TNR. EVERYTHING has a footnote, some extremely long and usually unnecessary. The old man who wrote it, "Zampano," writes in incredible vivid detail of the house and its explorations and how it affected everyone involved in it. At times I found it interesting, and other times it was relentlessly boring. There were numerous "stylistic" choices made, such as a single word on a page (usually relating to explorations), upside down writing, reversed writing, all for reasons relating to the current theme. I had no idea if Johnny was supposed have created the manuscript this way, or if it were Zampano's choices.
Overall, TNR itself was interesting "nonfiction" but didn't draw any conclusions on whatever became of the house and where the mysterious hallways came from, even though Zampano interjected a lot of his own opinions throughout. I found it fascinating, though, just how much press and analysis Navidson's house gained after his movie was released.
Johnny's story. Johnny is shown slowly losing his mind as he continues piecing together TNR. This is done in gigantically long footnotes that were at times compelling, and other times confusing and, well, boring. The writing itself was solid and, even though both TNR and Johnny's story were in effect written by Danielewski, the two voices were distinct.
What I didn't understand, though, was why those things were happening to Johnny. Why was he hallucinating? Why was he screaming out in his sleep? All he was doing was compiling TNR. Why would he think that whatever happened in the house in TNR was also happening to him? The author never shows us.
Even worse, is that there is no end in Johnny's story. He goes off to find the house, doesn't find it, and then . . . that's kind of it. Even more confusing is when he visits a bar and hears the band playing a song inspired by TNR. He talks to the band and discovers they have a manuscript "downloaded off the internet" that they had voraciously read and marked up. The story in TNR inspired one of their songs (The Five and a Half Minute Hallway). Johnny is surprised, but doesn't reveal that he is the Johnny in the footnotes in the story.
When had House of Leaves/TNR been made available to the reading public? Johnny almost burned the manuscript once, but he never said that he published it online. Never. That one really threw me, even though Johnny himself didn't question it, like wait a minute, that manuscript is still in the trunk of my car.
Then there's all the supposed "secret codes" the reader is apparently supposed to decode (which I ranted about in another thread). After going through this thing, I had no desire to search for the sentences to decode.
By the time I got to the end, with the pages and pages of letters from Johnny's mother, I had lost interest. At this point I had a signed copy of Will Lavender's Obedience waiting for me to read, and every one of Johnny's mother's letters were redundant and didn't add any sort of conclusion to House of Leaves or Johnny himself.
All in all, House of Leaves is a unique approach to novel writing and story telling. I wish I had thought of the idea first, though. My approach, would have been different. I suppose HOL is "modernist fiction" but it really didn't thrill me as the awesome piece of literature so many people make it out to be.
I would love to know Danielewski's background, though: his inspiration for writing it, his background in writing nonfiction, and especially how he found a publisher for it. How do you write a query letter for something like this?
allen