Do You Think You Could Respond To This? (Part II)

[Drachen Jager]

Which of the contributors here do you think fits that profile?

 

[flyingtart]

Do you know any?

 

[Nymtoc]

Didn't there used to be a sweet-wholesome-darling-innocent-pure-girl thread here, and hasn't it been archived for lack of interest?

 

[flyingtart]

Where is it?

 

[WriterWho]

Who started that thread?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Did you?

 

[WriterWho]

Should I?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Do you think you belong there?

 

[WriterWho]

Don't you think I would fit if it was a "sweet day/naughty night outrageous lie" type of thread?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Wouldn't that be a better fit?

 

[WriterWho]

Do you think anyone would post on it?

 

[flyingtart]

Why would they?

 

[WriterWho]

Don't you think it might be fun?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Do you think there would be more activity during the day, or during the night?

 

[WriterWho]

Don't you think the irony of the day might outnumber the ridiculous of the night?

 

[Drachen Jager]

You don't think the titillation of the night's stories would win the day?

 

[WriterWho]

Are you saying AWers are more naughty than sweet?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Isn't it possible to be both, like edible underwear?

 

[WriterWho]

Have you gone through many pairs of edible underwear?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Doesn't that depend on your definition of 'edible'?

 

[WriterWho]

Um . . . what's your definition?

 

[Drachen Jager]

Well, isn't most underwear edible if you really put your mind to it?

 

[WriterWho]

So, if I concentrate real hard, most underwear will turn into cupcakes?

 

[Nymtoc]

Won't a lot of it turn into short(s)cake?

 

[WriterWho]

Wouldn't that be a little uncomfortable?