- Joined
- Nov 5, 2006
- Messages
- 17,876
- Reaction score
- 4,671
- Location
- dunking doughnuts at Dunkin' Donuts
Just skimmed over most of the longer brief, and it's interesting they're calling into question the PA author's ability to write in relation to King's.
Also gotta love this footnote from page 13:
Also gotta love this footnote from page 13:
4ther than the conclusory allegation that his work was and is for sale in various venues,
Plaintiff pleads no facts to support a finding of actual access or of widespread distribution to
presume access. (Cplt ¶ 9.) Nonetheless, should the Court deny this motion in any part, access
will be fiercely contested, as Stephen King never heard of Rod Marquardt or Rod Morgan until
he read about the commencement of this lawsuit in a trade publication, and, to this date, has
never seen the Plaintiff’s book.